How CIA's 94 Words on Benghazi Got It So Wrong
'WSJ' looks at how the CIA's consulate-attack talking points came to be
By Kate Seamons, Newser Staff
Posted Dec 4, 2012 8:29 AM CST
Soot and debris spills out of the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012.   (AP Photo/Ibrahim Alaguri)

(Newser) – The Wall Street Journal today takes a look at the life and death of 94 little words: the heavily edited and ultimately faulty Benghazi talking points compiled by the CIA in the wake of the consulate attack.

  • Just a day after the attack, the CIA's reports were already referencing al-Qaeda in the Islamic Mahgreb.
  • The following day, David Petraeus appeared before House and Senate groups; he, too, mentioned the terrorists, and was asked to compile unclassified talking points that Congress could use.
  • By noon on Sept. 14, a draft was circulating—and it referenced al-Qaeda.

  • But an exhausting process of editing followed, with more than two dozen CIA officials weighing in on the copy over email—and battling about the inclusion of al-Qaeda.
  • Those opposed argued it should be removed because the intel was shaky (sourced from intercepted phone calls) and over fears it could alert al-Qaeda members to the fact that they were being watched. The opponents won out, though the term "extremists" remained; the FBI agreed with the call. It also contained this line: "The demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo."
  • On Sept. 15, the CIA station chief in Tripoli began to voice his concern with the assertions that the attack was both spontaneous and that demonstrations were occurring. He sent the CIA an email summarizing his thoughts the next day—but Susan Rice had already been hand-delivered the 94 fateful words the night before, so that she could prep for her news show appearances.
Click for the Journal's full take, which charts the ultimate change in the CIA's assessment.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
How CIA's 94 Words on Benghazi Got It So Wrong is...
42%
11%
12%
8%
8%
19%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 48 comments
Bullfrog1
Dec 5, 2012 7:38 AM CST
Benghazi also had the Lindsey Graham and John McCain "Witch Hunt" debacle? Those two loose cannons thought they found gold but it was just fly shit in pepper. Those two are the poster boys for term limits in Congress.
lahoud
Dec 4, 2012 12:29 PM CST
Keep up the Bain-gazi chatter, faux did nothing but that in the weeks running up to the election, and what a game changer it was!
sean8513
Dec 4, 2012 11:17 AM CST
get this out of our heads already...the people we elected to represent our common interests are more worried about an incident that happened on foreign soil thousands of miles away and the word usage used to depict this event instead of pressing domestic issues we elected them for