Loner James Holmes Was Dating: Emails
Messages reveal university's response to shooting
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Dec 6, 2012 4:39 AM CST
In this July 23, 2012 file photo, James Holmes appears in Arapahoe County District Court in Centennial, Colo.   (AP Photo/Denver Post, RJ Sangosti, Pool, File)

(Newser) – Newly released emails paint a clearer picture of the Aurora shooting suspect—and the University of Colorado's reaction to the attack. Former student James Holmes didn't have many friends, but he did briefly have a girlfriend who was in India during the shooting, the AP reports. Holmes "had a brief romantic relationship with one of the grad students in my program last fall," wrote a faculty member in an email to a friend shortly after the attack. "She knows, and is pretty freaked out."

There were a few others who knew him, wrote the head of the neuroscience department from which Holmes withdrew: "He was friendly with 1-2 students in another program," she noted, citing fears for the safety of fellow students and faculty. An assistant professor writes in another email that his notes on Holmes from a recruitment interview are still available, but a later email says an attorney told campus officials to "purge those data." Later the attorney changed her mind. The emails' release follows a court battle. Initially, a judge had blocked their release to ensure a fair trial, but media opposition prompted the judge to alter his order. Still, much of the material is redacted.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Loner James Holmes Was Dating: Emails is...
20%
5%
11%
8%
1%
54%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 2 of 2 comments
HANKHILL
Dec 6, 2012 8:40 AM CST
holmes was the only killer. he did it no doubt! now kill him and get this sad story over with!
DougMasters
Dec 6, 2012 7:12 AM CST
", a judge had blocked their release to ensure a fair trial, but media opposition prompted the judge to alter his order. Still, much of the material is redacted." Media opposition forced a judge to alter an order he gave to ensure someone got a fair trial? Ya know I wouldn't have a problem if our media outlet today wasn't so sensationalist for sensationlist sake. You know it's sad when you're at the point of trusting your legal system more than the media.