Occupy Legacy: Tougher Laws Against Protests
Some fear free speech of all is at risk: LA Times
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Dec 6, 2012 2:22 PM CST
In this April 2012 file photo, a handful of Occupy Boise activists remained at the group's encampment in downtown Boise, Idaho.   (AP Photo/Jessie L. Bonner, File)

(Newser) – As Occupy Wall Street first moved across the country, protests enjoyed a fair amount of tolerance from—and even sometimes popularity with—local government. But as time has dragged on, the "ironic legacy" of Occupy is tightened restrictions on public demonstrations, the Los Angeles Times reports. Many cities have passed ordinances requiring protesters to follow all sorts of new rules when picketing or camping out; permits are more difficult to obtain, and there are increased penalties when rules are broken.

Some are concerned the new restrictions threaten free speech for everyone. "It reflects a hostility to protest," says an ACLU attorney. "What we've seen is a response not different from Bull Connor." Counters Los Angeles' deputy city attorney, "The movement has a right to exercise speech, but the city has a right to regulate its public spaces." Advocates are also concerned the new laws will affect homeless people the most, particularly the new restrictions on camping in public places.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Occupy Legacy: Tougher Laws Against Protests is...
8%
11%
3%
37%
27%
14%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 46 comments
DougMasters
Dec 7, 2012 5:50 AM CST
Forget occupy. All they did was... lets face it practically nothing. There were idiots. Determined idiots but idiots. "I hate the way the big corporations are killing us so we will move out of our parent's basement and into a tent on a lawn, even though the policies are made in washington and we should be protesting washington" Occupy is kind of a big metaphor with my other fellow citizens.
Wydeeyed
Dec 7, 2012 1:26 AM CST
Interesting to see the use of ironic in the article because that was my first thought. Ironic that protest is shackled in the democracy whose legacy and birthright is protest.
Endorphins
Dec 6, 2012 10:50 PM CST
How about instead of occupying, why don't they BOYCOTT buying products from the very corporations they are protesting? Would be so much more effective.