Walmart Ducked Mexican Laws via Rampant Bribery
Mexican arm was 'aggressive and creative corrupter': NYT
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Dec 18, 2012 7:50 AM CST
A shopper carries out a newly-purchased television past protestors outside a Walmart store Friday Nov. 23, 2012, in Paramount, Calif.   (AP Photo/Nick Ut)

(Newser) – Following the New York Times' April revelation that Walmart silenced a 2006 probe into the company's Mexican bribery scandal, the Times took things into its own hands. In a lengthy investigation, the paper finds that Walmart de Mexico, the country's largest private employer, wasn't a helpless player in a sleazy system: Instead, it was "an aggressive and creative corrupter" whose payoffs allowed it to work around laws and beat out the competition. In a look at 19 store sites tied to bribes, the paper found that "the strictly forbidden became miraculously attainable": In one case, amid $341,000 in bribes, the company set up a Sam's Club in busy Mexico City—without a building license, environmental permit, or traffic permit.

When the firm wanted to build on a private alfalfa field, new zoning regulations should have prevented it—but the regulations weren't official until a map was printed in a government paper. So execs paid an insider $52,000 to get the map changed before its printing. (More than $200,000 in bribes were tied to that location in total.) A former lawyer for the company told US execs about the persistent problem, and referenced the alfalfa field location. But those bosses didn't tell Mexican authorities about the lawyer's report, and Mexican investigators, "unaware of this new evidence," ultimately found no wrongdoing in the case. The company is currently conducting a wide-ranging investigation into all 27 of its non-US markets. Click through for the Times' full piece.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Walmart Ducked Mexican Laws via Rampant Bribery is...
18%
22%
5%
42%
5%
7%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 18 comments
awojoone1
Dec 22, 2012 4:09 AM CST
wal--fart SUCKS !!
KooKooforCocoPuffs
Dec 20, 2012 1:21 PM CST
I wouldn't jump to demonizing Walmart just yet seeing as how, in Mexico, often bribery is the ONLY way to get things done. I'm not sure which is worse, tho: Walmart paying bribes, or Mexican officials requiring them - in which case if they were required by Mexican officials, it's more like just paying a standard fee. Seems like a stalemate to me.
793tango
Dec 18, 2012 3:13 PM CST
Is anyone really surprised by this? Especially given Walmarts history here in the states?