Iran on Restarting Nuke Probe: No
IAEA negotiators had hoped to make progress before six-nations talks
By Mark Russell, Newser Staff
Posted Jan 18, 2013 8:39 AM CST
Herman Nackaerts of the International Atomic Energy Agency speaks to the press before his flight to Iran at Vienna's Schwechat airport, Austria, Tuesday, Jan. 15, 2013.   (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

(Newser) – The International Atomic Energy Agency's latest round of negotiations with Iran ended today without any real progress made toward restarting investigations into Iran's nuclear program, reports the AP. The United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany head to Tehran later this month for direct talks, and those countries had hoped that an Iran-IAEA deal would indicate that Iran would be ready to compromise when they all sit down.

Had it compromised on the IAEA probe, Iran could have argued that the onus was now on the six powers to show some flexibility, temper their demands, and roll back US and European sanctions. The main sticking point is reportedly Iran's insistence that any investigation not be open-ended and that it be allowed to look at the intelligence gathered so far by the United States and other IAEA members. Talks with the IAEA are scheduled to resume in February, but some observers worry that the delays are just stalling tactics from Iran.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Iran on Restarting Nuke Probe: No is...
12%
12%
7%
14%
33%
21%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 1 of 2 comments
Borgirost
Jan 18, 2013 8:52 AM CST
It sounds to me like they're ready to make an agreement, as long as they can ensure that US intelligence isn't falsifying and exgagerating their programs. They are surprisingly willing to let us investigate the facility, but the only catch is that our government can't say they have more threatening programs than they actually do. Which isn't a new thing. Bush started it, and so far Obama seems to be furthering the "imminent and unavoidable terror over seas". Oooh, maybe Obama can force his secretary of state to lie to the UN as well, and we can start a brand new war in Iran! Tasty.