Touche: Times Reviewer Refutes Tesla Accusations
Including the weird one about driving in circles in a parking lot
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 15, 2013 1:13 PM CST
A 2010 photo of the Tesla Model S electric sedan.   (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

(Newser) – A New York Times auto reviewer has issued a point-by-point rebuttal to Tesla's claims that he deliberately set out to make the Model S electric car look bad. In one of the standout accusations, based on the car's driving logs, Tesla's Elon Musk wrote that John Broder "drove in circles for over half a mile in a tiny, 100-space parking lot" in an attempt to run down the battery. How on earth might Broder explain that? Pretty easily, it turns out:

  • "I drove around the Milford service plaza in the dark looking for the Supercharger, which is not prominently marked. I was not trying to drain the battery. (It was already on reserve power.) As soon as I found the Supercharger, I plugged the car in."

Adds Simon Dumenco at AdAge: "Stay tuned for, surely, more drama to come—including return fire from Musk—and hopefully a TV-movie dramatization of this epic CEO-vs.-reporter, blog-vs.-blog battle." But while this might seem over the top, the real story here is how the spat illustrates the growing importance of log data, writes Matt Quinn at VentureBeat. "This week, the world was introduced to a key big data story whether they knew it or not."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Touche: Times Reviewer Refutes Tesla Accusations is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 13 comments
Feb 15, 2013 4:51 PM CST
I wonder if you can rent these at "Hertz."
Feb 15, 2013 3:55 PM CST
"he deliberately set out to make the Model S electric car look bad" Shocking!!!
Feb 15, 2013 3:46 PM CST
I read an article on this earlier this week. Driving in circles is not the only thing the reviewer did to make the car look bad. Sounds to me like the reviewer was looking to make this into a bigger story than just a review. He was looking for bad results, went the extra mile to get them and designed, tested, and implemented the tests in such a way as to receive the worst results.