Violence Against Women Act Breezes Through House
Enough Republicans cross aisle to pass Senate version of bill
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Feb 28, 2013 12:15 PM CST
In this Jan. 23, 2013, file photo, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., holds a news conference on Capitol Hill to discuss the reintroduction of the Violence Against Women Act.   (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

(Newser) – The House today overwhelmingly approved the Senate's version of the Violence Against Women Act, by a vote of 286-138. Included in that tally were every Democrat and 87 Republicans; all 138 opposing votes were Republicans. The GOP leadership had opposed the Senate version of the bill, but changed their tune after the election when they realized they didn't have the votes to pass the House version, the Hill reports.

House Republicans tried to pass their version anyway, putting forward an amendment that would have subbed it in, but it failed on a 166-257 vote, with 60 Republicans voting against it and only two Democrats voting for it. The Senate also tossed Republicans a bone by removing a key provision from the version of the bill they passed in the last Congress, which would have made it easier for non-citizens who were victims of domestic abuse to obtain visas.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Violence Against Women Act Breezes Through House is...
4%
1%
3%
62%
5%
25%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 37 comments
sallyforced
Mar 2, 2013 8:26 AM CST
This is once again no more than political to get votes. I call "BS" on this one since we already have laws on the books
Murahu
Mar 1, 2013 7:18 PM CST
The same liberal crowd that demands that women go into combat, that women be police, and fire fighters, suddenly say women are so weak that they are victims of men and need the violence against women act. This is WRONG. There should be laws to protect anyone who is a victim of violence, male or female, no matter who the perpetrator is, male or female. If women are to serve in combat, they do not need, and should not have, a violence against women law.
realtruth
Mar 1, 2013 7:12 AM CST
Nothing but pure Sexism.. I should be offended if I didn’t think they were already just a bunch of weak females.