Forget WikiLeaks: Manning Should Have Gone to NYT
He might have seen more leniency: Bill Keller
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Mar 11, 2013 12:18 PM CDT
In this Nov. 28, 2012 file photo, Army Pfc. Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2012.   (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)

(Newser) – Bradley Manning told a military court that he'd tried to contact the New York Times with the host of diplomatic cables that ended up hitting WikiLeaks. Things might have been different if he'd succeeded, speculates Bill Keller in the Times. Private Manning might have benefited: "I suspect the fact that Manning chose the anti-establishment WikiLeaks as his collaborator made the government more eager to add on that dubious charge of 'aiding the enemy,'" Keller writes.

What's more, had the Times gotten the goods first, WikiLeaks wouldn't have been able to publish the unedited collection of cables—a move that put activists and informants named in the documents at risk. "In fact, you might not have heard of WikiLeaks," Keller notes. And if the world had gotten to know Manning via the Times, we might have a better sense of him. "Lionized by WikiLeaks and his fan base as a whistle-blower and martyr, cast by his prosecutors as a villainous traitor, he has become dueling caricatures." Click for Keller's full column.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Forget WikiLeaks: Manning Should Have Gone to NYT is...
8%
38%
9%
14%
3%
29%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 11 comments
G.O.P.
Mar 12, 2013 8:38 AM CDT
Yeah, give good old Judith Miller a call
Riffran
Mar 11, 2013 1:59 PM CDT
tough shit...you boarded the train...now enjoy the ride
bigeyedfish
Mar 11, 2013 1:17 PM CDT
if he had gone to the times nobody would have ever heard of the cables, or bradly manning.