Court Sounds Skeptical About DOMA
Kennedy seems concerned that it violates states' rights
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Mar 27, 2013 12:15 PM CDT
Rebecca Winchell of Columbia, Md. sings in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, March 27, 2013.    (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

(Newser) – The Supreme Court has concluded its oral arguments on the Defense of Marriage Act (the second half of its gay marriage double bill), and most observers think things are looking bad for the 1996 law; in a tweet, SCOTUSblog predicted that the court was "80% likely to strike down" the law. Here's what went down:

  • The key vote, Anthony Kennedy, seems concerned that the law violated states' rights, according to SCOTUSblog. "The question is whether the federal government, under a federalism system, has the authority to regulate marriage," he said, according to the New York Times.

  • The court's liberal justices, meanwhile, approached the case from a gay rights perspective. The system, Ruth Bader Ginsberg complained, creates "two kinds of marriage: Full marriage, and the skim-milk marriage."
  • Much time was spent discussing the Obama administration’s decision not to defend the law, Reuters reports. Kennedy found the decision "very troubling," while Scalia said we were in a "new world" and "totally unprecedented."
  • CNN legal analysts have said that if the court wants to punt on the issue, it could declare that House Republicans did not have the standing to defend the law in the first place. But Stephen Breyer pointed out a 1983 case in which the House was at odds with INS.
  • John Roberts expressed irritation that the Obama administration would continue to enforce the law, but not defend it. "I don't see why he doesn't have the courage of his convictions," he said. He also asked a government lawyer how the Justice Department would decide which laws to defend in the future. "What is your test?"

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Court Sounds Skeptical About DOMA is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 55 comments
Mar 28, 2013 6:04 AM CDT
I am not an advocate of Homosexuals. I think they are mentally ill nasty things. They can have all the rights they want, but that doesn’t stop them from being nasty perverts. ****************I am straight and have rights too,************* I don’t want homosexuals waiting on me, talking to me or even being around me.
Mar 27, 2013 4:37 PM CDT
Get rid of DOMA and then dismiss the prop 8 case. Take the Feds out of this and remand it back to the individuals states. This is a lot of hoopla about nothing we have bigger fish to fry than worring about some gays that want to play house.
Mar 27, 2013 3:44 PM CDT
The question is whether the federal government, under a federalism system, has the authority to regulate marriage," I totally agree the federal goverment should not be involved in regulating ANY marriage. Therefore according to the above I should be able to marry as many men or women as I choose to.