Daniel Victor at Nieman Journalism Lab explains the futility of hashtags

By Kevin Spak,  Newser User

Posted Mar 29, 2013 1:36 PM CDT
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email

(Newser) – Hashtags are, in one sense, incredibly popular—and that's also why they're incredibly useless, argues Daniel Victor at the Nieman Journalism Lab. Victor assumes that if you, say, put "#SuperBowl" on your tweets during the Super Bowl, you were hoping to get it in front of more interested eyeballs. But for popular hashtags like that one, "getting any single person’s attention is just short of impossible, like a single Niagara droplet screaming for notice as it shoots down the falls."

During the five-hour game, 3 million #SuperBowl tweets were sent, meaning that, on average, someone would have to search the tag within 1/17 of a second of your post to see it—and even then, they'd have to click from the "Top Tweets" view to the "All" view. But it can't hurt to try, right? Well, sort of. "Using a hashtag does no harm in the same way wood paneling does no harm to your station wagon," Victor argues, "or a misspelled tattoo does no harm to your bicep." They're kind of ugly, and "for every person who stumbles upon your tweet via hashtag, you’re likely turning off many more who are put off by hashtag overuse." Click for the full column.

Hashtags don't actually help you grow your audience.
Hashtags don't actually help you grow your audience.   (?)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We need not banish the hashtag, but let’s start putting more thought into when we’re using it. - Daniel Victor, Nieman Journalism Lab

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
SHARE YOUR TAKE: Twitter Facebook
Check out another Ridiculous story: Drug CEO and Internet Villain Is at It Again
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.