House Probes Whether Holder Lied Under Oath
AG claimed he 'never heard of' potential press prosecutions
By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted May 29, 2013 4:12 AM CDT
US. Attorney General Eric Holder, the nation's top law enforcement official, pauses while testifying before the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month.   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

(Newser) – Did Eric Holder lie under oath when he testified before the House Judiciary committee on the surveillance of reporters earlier this month? The committee is probing the attorney general, who said the "potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material" is "not something I’ve ever been involved in, heard of, or would think would be wise policy," the Hill reports. Days after Holder made that statement, it emerged that he had personally signed off on the seizure of the email and phone records of Fox reporter James Rosen to investigate whether he was complicit in a leak of classified information.

Rep. Hank Johnson, the Democrat whose question prompted the statement from Holder, has defended the attorney general, saying the statement was not intended to apply to other investigations. "The attorney general’s statement that no journalists have been prosecuted under the Espionage Act during his tenure is accurate,” he says.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
House Probes Whether Holder Lied Under Oath is...
10%
9%
4%
39%
3%
35%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 35 comments
phritz
Jun 1, 2013 11:22 PM CDT
the whole investigation of security leaks was initiated after the republicans attempted to use it as an issue to create more chaos in Washington.
phritz
Jun 1, 2013 11:16 PM CDT
the crazies in the republican side will keep investing holder when they could be passing some serious infrastructure legislation
user99
May 31, 2013 9:27 PM CDT
All politicians lie. All lawyers lie. How is anybody surprised?