Look Out, Boeing: Airbus A350 Takes 1st Flight
Light-weight, wide-body plane a serious competitor to 787
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Jun 14, 2013 10:35 AM CDT
The Airbus A350 takes off on its maiden flight at Blagnac airport near Toulouse, southwestern France, Friday, June 14, 2013.   (Bob Edme)

(Newser) – The Airbus A350's maiden flight ended with a safe landing today, setting the stage for intensifying competition with US rival Boeing in the long-haul wide-body aircraft market. Airspace at the airport in the southern French city of Toulouse, where Airbus has its headquarters, closed for both take-off and landing. The four-hour flight marks a key step on the path to full certification for the jet, which can carry between 250 and 400 passengers and is the European aircraft maker's best hope for catching up in a long-haul market dominated by Boeing's 787 and 777.

Boeing's list prices for its 787 line range from $206 million to $243 million. Airbus lists prices ranging from $254 million to $332 million, and had 613 orders as of May, compared with 890 orders for the 787. Steep discounts are common on large orders, although the details are rarely made public. Airbus claims the A350 burns 25% less fuel than the Boeing due to its lighter weight, redesigned Rolls Royce engines and new aerodynamics.

View 2 more images

Copyright 2016 Newser, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. AP contributed to this report.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Look Out, Boeing: Airbus A350 Takes 1st Flight is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 34 comments
Jun 17, 2013 10:18 PM CDT
I was supposed to fly a 787 to Paris but they got grounded so I flew a 777 instead. Beautiful plane the 777.
Jun 16, 2013 11:41 PM CDT
Have flown them all many times. I will take Boeing for lower noise, more comfort any time. I wonder if the A350's operating cost will be any closer to Aurbus's projections than the A340 were?
Jun 16, 2013 3:53 PM CDT
Airbus has a history of more crashes. It's cheaper, that's all. I'd rather be on a Boeing.