Zimmerman Lawyer Tells Awful Knock-Knock Joke
Harvard lawyer says it should be grounds for a mistrial
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Jun 25, 2013 10:45 AM CDT
Updated Jun 25, 2013 12:53 PM CDT
Loading... Please wait

(Newser) – George Zimmerman's attorney wasn't going to let the prosecutor have all the fun with his profanity-laced opening statement yesterday. Don West decided to make a splash in his opening as well—with the world's most awful knock-knock joke. After urging the jury to hold the joke against him rather than Zimmerman, he said. "Knock knock. Who's there? George Zimmerman. George Zimmerman who? All right, good, you're on the jury!" The response: crickets.

West later apologized, CNN reports. "No more bad jokes, I promise that," he said. "I was convinced it was the delivery." But the moment of attempted humor could be a big deal; Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz thinks Zimmerman could use it as grounds to request a mistrial. "The victim's family is sitting in the courtroom with tears in their eyes and he's telling a knock-knock joke?" Dershowitz told NewsMax TV, according to Fox News. "If a student ever did that in a mock court in my class, I would … ask him are you in the right school? Maybe you want to be a stand-up comedian. ... And, by the way, if you do, come up with better jokes."

View 1 image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Zimmerman Lawyer Tells Awful Knock-Knock Joke is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 231 comments
Jun 30, 2013 10:06 PM CDT
Knock knock. Who's there? Trayvon. Bullshit. Trayvon is dead. Now get away from my door or i'll shoot...
Jun 26, 2013 4:08 AM CDT
I am on zimms side in this but that joke was a bad idea. It is basically saying that women are less informed
Jun 26, 2013 1:12 AM CDT
To typecast this lawyer as an idiot would be a mistake.To typecast cast him as a cynical manipulator would be more accurate. It seems his modus operandi to combat the 'racial profiling' aspect of the charge is to subject the jury to a constant bombardment of racially loaded teenage despising vitriol thus making Z's comment seem 'normal'' and not too special. Short of total bias or stupidity by the jury,Z's going down if this is to be his lawyer's main methodology.