Queen's Jubilee Year Cost UK Taxpayers $50.7M
That's an extra $1.4M more than the year prior
By Arden Dier, Newser Staff
Posted Jun 27, 2013 10:16 AM CDT
Britain's Queen Elizabeth II looks up and waves to members of staff of The Foreign and Commonwealth Office as she ends an official visit which is part of her Jubilee celebrations in London.   (AP Photo/Alastair Grant Pool, file)

(Newser) – We're hoping that Britons enjoyed Queen Elizabeth's Diamond Jubilee year—because it ran taxpayers about $1.4 million more than the year before. The long-reigning monarch's official bottom line expenses came in at $50.7 million, according to royal finances. Where did the additional money go? Mainly to the upkeep of royal buildings and staff, according to Sky News. The figure shows a "real terms reduction in expenditure on supporting the Queen's official duties," the Keeper of the Privy Purse says. A few breakdowns on royal spending, courtesy of the public coffers:

  • Payroll: Rose from $26.6 million to $27.8 million
  • Property maintenance: All those castles and country estates aren't cheap. They went from $13.5 million to $13.8 million.
  • Travel: Fell from $7.6 million to $6.8 million.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Queen's Jubilee Year Cost UK Taxpayers $50.7M is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 24 comments
Jul 1, 2013 6:21 PM CDT
Still almost 50 mil. short of Obama's Ju Ju Bee
Jun 28, 2013 10:01 PM CDT
chump change when you have to pay the obama bills!!!!!!!!!!!
Jun 27, 2013 5:28 PM CDT
The Royal Jubilee may have cost Brits $50 million in expenses, but it brought in billions of dollars in revenues. Why are Newser writers so short sighted? BTW, don't they denominate their currency in "Pounds"?