It's Filibuster Showdown Time
No deal reached to avert Senate rule change
By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted Jul 16, 2013 4:50 AM CDT
Updated Jul 16, 2013 7:30 AM CDT
Senators walk to a closed-door meeting in the Old Senate Chamber for a showdown between Republican and Democratic leaders over presidential nominees that have been blocked by a GOP filibuster.   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

(Newser) – A historic showdown in the Senate is looming after a rare, closed-door meeting of all but two of the 100 senators failed to produce a deal to avoid a change to the chamber's rules. Unless lawmakers can hammer out a deal this morning, a vote this morning on the nomination of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau could trigger Harry Reid's threat to use the "nuclear option" to reform the filibuster via a party-line vote, reports the Washington Post. Reid says the GOP can avoid the showdown by allowing simple-majority confirmations on presidential nominees for executive branch positions, including Cordray, that it has been blocking.

Reid says banning filibusters against executive branch nominations would be a narrow change, but it will still be the biggest change in how the Senate operates in 40 years and could pave the way for the total death of the filibuster, the New York Times notes. Reid appears to have President Obama's support for the threatened change: White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters last night that the Senate "needs to confirm this president's nominees in a timely and efficient manner," and that will be true "for the next president, and the next president after that. This has become ridiculous." Asked whether Obama fears that the change could make the Senate more dysfunctional, Carney said, "it boggles the mind how they would achieve that," the AP reports.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
It's Filibuster Showdown Time is...
4%
4%
0%
40%
6%
46%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 76 comments
DougMasters
Jul 16, 2013 11:17 AM CDT
"Reid says the GOP can avoid the showdown by allowing simple-majority confirmations on presidential nominees for executive branch positions, including Cordray, that it has been blocking." That's interesting... if the filibuster is so bad in principal it should be banned, but if it isn't such a monstrous thing then you only want it to stop being used for executive picks? That sounds a little stupid.
LoginsSuck
Jul 16, 2013 11:02 AM CDT
Asked whether Obama fears that the change could make the Senate more dysfunctional, Carney said, "it boggles the mind how they would achieve that ha ha ha ha ha ha good one. I wonder who will blink first.
Crotalus
Jul 16, 2013 9:10 AM CDT
I would like to quote a previous poster on this board. They are right on target with their analysis of these POS in Washington. " almost every one of the people in our house and senate are frauds! They have stolen from us, got us into wars, profited from our pain and work. They have used raciest division (on both sides) to keep us separated, flamed the fans of hate, homophobia, and class warfare in order to stay in power. All but a hand-full make me want to puke. I am not alone, I am certain I am in the majority when I say NONE of them work for me. And yet like clockwork they will all be back next year and the year after that and the year after that... "