Filibuster Lives: Senate Skirts 'Nuclear Option'
Most Obama picks will go through
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Jul 16, 2013 12:03 PM CDT
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid center, walks to closed-door meeting yesterday.   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

(Newser) – The Senate's little version of the Bay of Pigs is over, and this one won't end with nukes, either. After much hemming and hawing and stern pronouncements, both sides reached a deal to avoid a showdown over filibuster rules, meaning Harry Reid won't use the so-called "nuclear option" to make them more difficult to call, reports Politico. Under the deal, Republicans agreed to let all but two of President Obama's in-limbo nominees sail through—including Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Obama has to pick two new nominees for the National Labor Relations Board, replacing ones who were originally recess appointments. (The latter involves a whole other legal mess still being sorted out in court.)

At Slate, Dave Weigel translates the filibuster deal thusly: "Total victory for Democrats with some face-saving for Republicans." The GOP killed two of the picks, but "by giving Democrats nearly everything they asked for, Republicans avoided a change to the filibuster." Ed Morrissey at Hot Air notes that the GOP is taking heat for "caving," but they didn't have much choice once it became clear Reid was serious. "They probably got what they could get—blackballing the two NLRB appointees and forcing the White House to replace them—but they weren’t going to get rid of Cordray or any of the rest of these seven."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Filibuster Lives: Senate Skirts 'Nuclear Option' is...
4%
4%
9%
21%
7%
56%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 42 comments
sfreeman
Jul 16, 2013 8:27 PM CDT
Reid caved. He should have insisted on straight up-and-down votes for all seven of the President's nominees. If the GOP wants to oppose them, fine. They shouldn't be subject to a filibuster however.
cornelison
Jul 16, 2013 5:34 PM CDT
Make no mistake. This is NOT all the fault of Republicans. There's a core of Democrats who want to keep the filibuster. Why? They do NOT want to vote on certain issues. More recently. that's gun reform. 1. Democrats need corporate money in order to be competitive with Republicans. 2. Some Democrats are afraid of the NRA & the constituents who want unlimited gun ownership. 3. The GOP has been very successful in warping Obamacare. Again, the GOP outspending over the Dems.
backtooakland
Jul 16, 2013 5:00 PM CDT
See, balls do matter.