Cops: Missouri Man Says He Exposed 300 Men to HIV
David Lee Mangum was arrested last week
By Kate Seamons, Newser Staff
Posted Sep 5, 2013 6:03 AM CDT
Updated Sep 5, 2013 8:00 AM CDT
A HIV/AIDS rapid blood test shows the two red strips of a positive result.   (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

(Newser) – An HIV-positive Missouri man now has more to fear than romantic rejection. Police allege that David Lee Mangum has exposed some 300 sexual partners to HIV in the last decade, which is how long he has known he's had HIV. They say the 37-year-old told them as much during their interview with him, reports the Daily Statesman. Mangum was arrested Aug. 28 after a former partner, identified only as DB, contacted police. DB says Mangum told him he had no STDs, but that after the two broke up in June he received a phone call from Magnum's old roommate, who alerted him to Magnum's condition. DB's HIV test came back positive.

The Los Angeles Times cites two jarring facts from the probable-cause statement. First, police wrote that Mangum did confirm to them that he "never disclosed he had HIV to any of his sexual partners in Stoddard County"—that's a rural Missouri county where as many as 60 of the partners he claims to have had live. Second, Mangum says he never told those partners due to "fear of rejection." USA Today reports he's scheduled to be arraigned this morning; he faces life in prison.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Cops: Missouri Man Says He Exposed 300 Men to HIV is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 71 comments
Sep 8, 2013 1:50 PM CDT
Wicked world! That's what you get for disobeying God's word!
Sep 6, 2013 10:25 AM CDT
Condoms people, use condoms!!! Doesn't matter what kind of sex you're having, or with who, always protect yourself. Some people will not admit they have something if you ask, some may not even know, but you'll have to live with it.
Sep 6, 2013 8:06 AM CDT
Honestly, as bad as this sounds, I don't even care. I don't care if you are gay, straight or whatever-- the bottom line is that "SAFE SEX" has been drilled into our heads since the late 80's so anyone out there CHOOSING to have unprotected sex is CHOOSING the consequence. It just makes me mad that these people who CHOOSE unsafe sex and CHOOSE diseases over safe sex will likely consume more healthcare costs than they've ever paid for. Which means they cost our nation money. We shouldn't have to pay for stupidity. There shouldn't be coverage for healthcare for STDs, it's a choice. They should have to pay out of pocket for their own care, or get none.