FAA Panel Clears Gadgets for Takeoff: Source
Gadgets, WiFi OKed for under 10K feet
By Ruth Brown, Newser Staff
Posted Oct 2, 2013 9:30 AM CDT
A person demonstrates the capabilities of a laptop during a media preview flight aboard an Airbus A320 aircraft equipped with an onboard WiFi.   (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

(Newser) – The end is in sight for that game in which the flight attendant tells you to turn off your e-reader for takeoff like she really thinks it's going to crash the plane, and you nod solemnly and pretend to actually turn it off until she's out of sight. Last week, sources told the AP that the FAA advisory committee had voted to approve the use of smartphones, tablets, e-readers, and other gadgets for takeoff and landing. But a senior Amazon executive on the advisory panel now tells the Wall Street Journal that the new recommendations go even further, clearing the way for "gate to gate use" of devices, regardless of the apps they're running or the wireless transmission mode they're in.

Paul Misener, Amazon's VP of global public policy, also says the panel recommended a simple system for airlines to prove that devices and WiFi won't interfere with their planes—one that looks at past tests instead of requiring a host of new ones. If the recommendations are approved, fliers would still have to use on-board WiFi to access the Internet—not due to safety concerns, but because the FCC bans airborne cell service. About 60% of commercial passenger planes are set up for WiFi, though the largest US inflight Internet provider says its service doesn't really work below 10,000 feet—so even though you may soon be allowed to read your Kindle during takeoff, you may not be able to download e-books at the time.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
FAA Panel Clears Gadgets for Takeoff: Source is...
3%
8%
2%
80%
5%
3%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 6 comments
HMD-SMD-ITY
Oct 5, 2013 2:59 PM CDT
So one of the fun things of travel as a kid was taking my 16mm camera and always filming the takeoffs and landings. Since the late 80's I've always used some kind of video recorder to do the same. But since all this crap began, they made you turn off the video recorder for the duration of the flight. So, I theorized that my old wind up 16mm cameras have no electrical circuits, thus no on/off switch. So I asked a flight attendant relative if she thought it would work. She said they would still make me stow it during takeoff. So, I'm now trying to think about something I can rig to take 16mm movies out the window and not be visible to the attendants or other passengers (snitches). Maybe something fiber optic based.
No-Left-Turn
Oct 2, 2013 9:48 AM CDT
It's the FAA. They will take the Advisory Committee's input and get back to us in nine years. The only agency that is slower is the FDA.
Eat_Eateator
Oct 2, 2013 9:45 AM CDT
What about using cell phones to trigger bombs?