Sorry, Blood in Gourd Isn't from Louis XVI
Researchers map out genome
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Apr 25, 2014 10:06 AM CDT
King Louis XVI.   (Shutterstock)

(Newser) – A famous gourd was believed to contain the blood of Louis XVI after he was beheaded: It said as much in an inscription, and some research has appeared to confirm it. Now, however, experts have sequenced the blood's genome, and they're saying the opposite, the BBC reports. Their research indicates that the former owner of the blood very likely had brown eyes, whereas Louis XVI's were blue, according to portraits.

What's more, "this sample doesn't have an excess of markers that could be related to a very tall person," as Louis was believed to be, says expert Carles Lalueza-Fox. The genome also may indicate that the person was of a northern Italian background, LiveScience notes. In short, "it really looks like we don't have the king here," Lalueza-Fox says.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Sorry, Blood in Gourd Isn't from Louis XVI is...
13%
52%
3%
14%
3%
16%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 8 comments
$103359148
Apr 25, 2014 2:41 PM CDT
- whereas Louis XVI's were blue, "according to portraits" - could be related to a very tall person," as Louis was "believed to be" In other words, they don't know what the hell they are talking about.
justreading1
Apr 25, 2014 1:46 PM CDT
It is interesting the information that can be determined by science! But I do have one question, Why is the reasoning for this?
BudPissington
Apr 25, 2014 1:05 PM CDT
NOOOO!