Hillary Clinton Should Thank Monica Lewinsky
Columnists react to Lewinsky's 'Vanity Fair' article
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted May 7, 2014 12:09 PM CDT
In this July 11, 2001, file photo, Monica Lewinsky arrives for a special screening of "The Score" in New York.   (AP Photo/Darla Khazei, File)

(Newser) – The timing of Monica Lewinsky's new article—as Hillary Clinton seems on the brink of a 2016 presidential campaign—may seem unfortunate for Clinton. On the contrary, writes Ruth Marcus in the Washington Post: Though the affair wasn't really mentioned during Clinton's 2008 campaign, that won't be the case in 2016. Rand Paul "has already raised the question of whether Democrats in general, and Hillary Clinton in particular, should consort with a 'sexual predator' like Bill Clinton," Marcus writes. But Lewinsky is clear in her article that the affair was consensual, "so her piece defuses Paul’s line of attack. And it does so before any Clinton presidential announcement," Marcus concludes. "If and when a Clinton presidential announcement comes, Lewinsky will be old news." More reactions:

  • In the New York Times, Maureen Dowd is back to her old pastime of criticizing Lewinsky, calling it "disingenuous" and "pretentious" that Lewinsky should say she was inspired to speak out by Tyler Clementi's suicide.
  • On Jezebel, Kate Dries is similarly unimpressed. Headline: "Vanity Fair Gives Monica Lewinsky 15 More Minutes."
  • Robin Abcarian is even harsher in the Los Angeles Times: "We all know the story: In 1998, a horny 21-year-old White House intern flashes her thong at a horny commander-in-chief."
  • But on the Daily Beast, Emily Shire hits back against that sort of talk. We've long forgiven Bill Clinton, but many people are still eager to "slut shame" Lewinsky, she writes. "It would be nice to think that in 2014, when we’re much quicker to call out slut-shaming in politics, entertainment, and everyday life, Lewinsky would be received with a little more understanding. But apparently when it comes to Monica Lewinsky, it’s 1998 all over again."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Hillary Clinton Should Thank Monica Lewinsky is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 79 comments
May 15, 2014 2:38 PM CDT
Yep, at least with Monica in the mix, Hillary wasn't made to polish the presidential podium.
May 8, 2014 12:02 AM CDT
When this Lewinsky-Clinton scandal broke out I lost all respect for Clinton; I thought he had better taste in women. It must have been one of those situations where, " if you meet a woman that's below your standards; you lower your standards".
Ezekiel 25:17
May 7, 2014 11:45 PM CDT
People from the Hope and Little Rock areas of Ar-Kansas know that Bill had his women, such as Paula Jones, and Hillary had her men, such as Ar-Kansas troopers. They had an open marriage when he was governor and people were fine with it. Those same troopers that gave it to Hillary also drove Bill to his tricks at local Little Rock no-tell motels. These are not the same troopers named in Troopergate. Hillary was not getting satisfaction from old Mr. syphilis so she turned to her body guards. This is part of the reason she got indicted on the White water incident and went to trial. But you know that FBI agents in charge in the case wanted to first advance indictment for The Mena Connections. But they got shot down and it was a mess for them. I think they could still unseal the Mena indictments involving the death of people. But when and if they will do that is in question. Its kind of an impossibility unless a Republican wins office. She's most likely going to win the presidency because no Republican can ever counter 130,000,000 voting entitlement sucking recipients.