Female-Named Storms Kill More
We're not as afraid of them, don't prepare as much, study finds
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Jun 3, 2014 7:13 AM CDT
Green Mountain Power dispatcher Jeff Brosseau checks the status board in preparation for Hurricane Sandy on Monday, Oct. 29, 2012 in Colchester, Vt.   (AP Photo/Toby Talbot)

(Newser) – Our hurricane-naming system taps into an unconscious sexism—and the results are potentially disastrous, researchers say. A study suggests that when we hear a female name for a hurricane, we're less worried, and thus less likely to prepare adequately, than we would be if the name were male, the Washington Post reports. "These findings suggest the value of considering a new system for hurricane naming to reduce the influence of biases on hurricane risk assessments," researchers write.

Experts reviewed the 47 most damaging hurricanes between 1950, when naming began, and 2012. They found that hurricanes with female names killed an average of 45 people, while those with male names killed an average of 23. In surveys, respondents expected more intensity from hurricanes with male names, while "people imagining a ‘female’ hurricane were not as willing to seek shelter," says researcher Sharon Shavitt. Some journalists asked her whether the study was a joke, she tells the Los Angeles Times. Nope: "It now appears that gender biases apply not only to people, but also to things."

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Sexism Makes Female-Named Storms Deadlier is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 22 comments
Jun 4, 2014 11:46 AM CDT
Hell hath no fury like a woman stormed.
Jun 4, 2014 8:11 AM CDT
A real study would go over more relevant characteristics like dates, surrounding weather conditions, special ocean current conditions and other contributing factors like temperature differences between the poles and equator and even solar effects. This study only reconfirms that one of the most told lies in history is "This is scientific."
Jun 3, 2014 5:30 PM CDT
This is an incredibly dumb bit of information. Anyone who takes a hurricane less seriously because of it's issued name, is just begging to be on the wrong end of natural selection.