Why the USPS Has Lost $2.5B in Alaska
33-year-old earmark fuels operation
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Jun 30, 2014 10:40 AM CDT
In this Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, file photo, US Postal Service letter carrier Michael McDonald delivers mail.   (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)

(Newser) – For the past three decades, the US Postal Service has subsidized deliveries to remote parts of Alaska. Law requires the agency to pay private air carriers above the market rate for shipments there, and the agency then charges retailers just half of the commercial shipping price. The results have hammered a struggling Postal Service: Thanks to the subsidies, the agency has lost $2.5 billion over 33 years, the Washington Post reports. Last year alone, the subsidies cost the USPS $77.5 million, officials say; the money comes from the Postal Service's customers.

The subsidies benefit rural Alaskan businesses, but locals still pay high prices for goods. Retailers may mark up prices by as much as 30% or more, Lisa Rein writes in the Post. A pallet of drinks, for instance, cost the Postal Service $3,200 to send, but Alaska Commercial paid only $485 for the postage. Even so, a 12-pack of Coke from the shipment cost a family more than $15 at the Alaska Commercial store. It's all because of an earmark by former senator Ted Stevens to ensure delivery to remote Alaska—but that was 33 years ago, and these days the Postal Service's finances are dangerously tight. Still, legislative action is difficult, Rein explains: Lawmakers don't want to see distant areas of the country lose access to goods. Click for the full piece.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Alaska Subsidies Have Cost Postal Service $2.5B is...
7%
8%
7%
2%
3%
74%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 45 comments
farleyj1
Jul 3, 2014 10:09 AM CDT
Congress at it finest once again. Congress can screw up a paper bag.
Scott603
Jul 1, 2014 5:39 AM CDT
I agree with fractal. Alaska is the second most Republican state in the country. Why subsidize mail service for a bunch of people who hate all government spending and view it all as waste.
iq145
Jun 30, 2014 11:01 PM CDT
Those farking bastages didn't LOSE diddly squat. They just didn't make as many millions as they wanted to make!