Media Can't Agree on Superdelegate Count
Posted
Apr 11, 08 6:23 PM CDT
in
Politics
(newser) –
Media can't settle on a superdelegate count these days because many of the mucky-mucks refuse to name a candidate, Politico reports. Current figures all have Clinton leading Obama—and she needs the votes badly—but media estimates vary from 256-225 to 221-209. “This is an art rather than a science," the New York Times’ political editor said.
Some big-name media, including NBC, refer to the campaigns for figures, relying on an honor system. But the AP tabulator won't ring up the candidates. "They’re always going to be a little higher than what our count would be," he said. Two novices have started a site, Democratic Convention Watch, relying on non-campaign sources, including readers' tips, to keep count. One said he emailed the candidates “but I’ve never heard anything back.”
Source
Politico
Threads
(1 of 7)
-
Feb 27, 08 4:43 PM CST
-
Feb 29, 08 8:27 AM CST
-
Apr 1, 08 6:14 AM CDT
-
Mar 10, 08 3:19 PM CDT
-
May 14, 08 5:58 PM CDT
-
Feb 29, 08 6:01 AM CST
-
May 1, 08 9:56 AM CDT
Loading...
Loading...