The Debate Was No Good for Anyone
Posted Apr 17, 08 1:12 PM CDT in
Politics
(Newser)
–
The pundit class agrees for once: No one (at least in the Democratic Party) benefited from last night’s angry debate. But the left and the right disagree on who’s at fault:
- The first half was “garbage time,” Jonathan Cohn writes in the New Republic, with the moderators creating “a long infomercial about Obama’s electability issues.” Cohn is shocked that ABC’s finest hit so many nonsense issues—the Weathermen, the lapel pin, Bittergate—and Clinton didn’t hold up well either.
- David Brooks doesn’t want to hear the “too many gaffe questions” excuse: “The journalist’s job is to make politicians uncomfortable.” He gives ABC a high mark for sticking it to the Dems, and notes that both made deeply irresponsible pledges on taxes and Iraq—ones they’d have to break in the Oval Office.
Sources:
New Republic,
New York Times,
Philadelphia Inquirer
Our editors also recommend:
Loading...
Premium Articles from HighBeam
-
Obama needs good offense in upcoming debates
Sep 21, 08
|
SouthtownStar (Chicago, IL)
-
Clinton vs. Obama
Jun 7, 08
|
U.S. Newswire
-
It's Not All in the Family for Some DNC Rules Committee Members; Don and Carole...
May 30, 08
|
U.S. News & World Report
-
American Solutions Urges Lincoln-Douglas Style Debates Between Senators Clinton...
Apr 29, 08
|
U.S. Newswire
-
Obama dismisses Clinton debate challenge ELECTIONS 2008
Apr 28, 08
|
International Herald Tribune
-
Clinton challenges Obama to unmoderated debate
Apr 27, 08
|
The Record (Bergen County, NJ)
-
Clinton eyes Oregon upset for momentum; A focus on local issues and a call...
Apr 27, 08
|
The Washington Times
-
Obama and Clinton rhetoric escalates
Apr 27, 08
|
Deseret News (Salt Lake City)
-
Clinton challenges Obama to debate without moderator
Apr 27, 08
|
Sunday Gazette-Mail
-
McCain, GOP split on Wright ad; Obama strategy stressing more ads, fewer debates.(PAGE...
Apr 26, 08
|
The Washington Times
Find more articles like this