Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Fannie-Freddie Merger: The Math Adds Up

As both companies plummet, combining them might make sense

By Clay Dillow,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 2, 2008 10:54 AM CDT

(Newser) – With Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac struggling to stay afloat, arguments for a merger are gathering steam. “Sometimes size can be a strength,” writes Andrew Ross Sorkin in the New York Times. The companies spent $1.825 billion in total overhead in the first half of 2008 doing exactly the same thing; a merged entity could save some $1.2 billion a year.

The merger would come at the cost of some 11,400 jobs, Sorkin acknowledges, but “pink slips are bound to be part of any fix.” A merger could also cut $1.8 billion in foreclosure costs and trim $300 million annually through increased leverage, creating as much as $19 billion in value overnight. “It would instill a huge amount of confidence,” one investment firm CEO said, and “doesn’t cost taxpayers one nickel.”

A merger between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants who are bleeding money doing the exact same things, is starting to make more sense.
A merger between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants who are bleeding money doing the exact same things, is starting to make more sense.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)
Freddie Mac, the embattled mortgage giant, wouldn't do better if combined with Fannie Mae. But it certainly wouldn't do worse.
Freddie Mac, the embattled mortgage giant, wouldn't do better if combined with Fannie Mae. But it certainly wouldn't do worse.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, file)
As foreclosures rise and home values plummet, Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's shares are plummeting. Why have two companies bleeding money when we could have one company bleeding less?
As foreclosures rise and home values plummet, Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's shares are plummeting. Why have two companies bleeding money when we could have one company bleeding less?   (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, file)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Most mergers fail. And the idea of mating two losers doesn’t exactly inspire the idea you'll get a winner. But with few practical solutions, this one is as good as any. - Andrew Ross Sorkin

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Be the first to comment on this story.

More Newser Stories

Greenspan: Housing Will Hit Bottom in 2009

Don't Blame Fannie for Mess

Fannie, Freddie Will Stop Foreclosures Over Holidays

Freddie Posts Record $25.3B Loss; Taps $13B Infusion

Fannie, Freddie Employees Watch Assets Plunge


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne