Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
7

Constitution May Sink Hillary's State Chance

Lawmakers can't take federal post for which their Congress raised the salary

Share

(Newser) – Should Barack Obama nominate Hillary Clinton for secretary of state, the confirmation process could be the least of her worries, the Washington Post reports. The Constitution prohibits any member of Congress from assuming a federal post whose salary has been increased during the lawmaker’s term; cabinet salaries have risen by about $15,000 since Clinton’s current term began.

Presidents have finessed this rule before, most notably Richard Nixon, who asked Congress to lower the wage of the attorney general so Sen. William Saxbe could assume the office in 1973. Robert Byrd is the only senator still serving of 10 who voted against Nixon’s “Saxbe Fix,” saying then, “we should not delude the American people into thinking a way can be found around the constitutional obstacle.”

Clinton flanked by New York State Gov. David Paterson and fellow Sen. Charles Schumer.
Clinton flanked by New York State Gov. David Paterson and fellow Sen. Charles Schumer.   (AP Photo)
Sen. Hillary Clinton.
Sen. Hillary Clinton.   (AP Photo)
Sen. Hillary Clinton speaks with attendees at the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights gala.
Sen. Hillary Clinton speaks with attendees at the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights gala.   (AP Photo)
Bill and Hillary Clinton in 1997.
Bill and Hillary Clinton in 1997.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
7 comments
VIEWING:
 
Sammy
Nov 20, 08 12:41 PM CST
Jesus Christ! This is about as silly a notion to keep Clinton out of the job as questions about Obama's birth certificate preventing him from assuming the Presidency. Don't you people have anything better to do than over reach for stories? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Mr.C
Nov 20, 08 2:15 PM CST
I thing the constitution is a pretty legitimate thing to be speaking about.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Sammy
Nov 20, 08 2:47 PM CST
This would prevent any current Senator from being named to Obama's cabinet due to a implied conflict of financial interest. We all know $15,000 means nothing financially to a Senator. I don't think our founding fathers would consider this a significant violation of our constitution but rather a barrier to appointing the best person for the job. Perhaps Obama should pick someone off the street. I still think this is a silly story. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
iamthereama
Nov 20, 08 3:03 PM CST
Meh. As if I could be any less excited about the election results. (I'm a third party person). Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
gr8fultom
Nov 21, 08 5:50 AM CST
Saying you are a 'third party person' demonstrates how poorly you understand our political system. I'll go as far as to predict that we will elect a black man to be the Pres. before a third-party candidate will even come close to winning.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.