Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


1

Navy, Greenies Settle Sonar Dispute

Both sides declare victory in long-running lawsuit

Share

(Newser) – The Navy and environmental groups both declared victory today after the two sides settled a lawsuit over sonar and its effect on whales and other marine mammals, the Los Angeles Times reports. The settlement, reached Friday, calls for Navy ships to avoid sensitive areas and reduce or halt sonar when marine mammals are nearby.

The deal doesn’t resolve scientists’ issues with the Navy, said an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, but “we’re hopeful it will lead to a much more effective dialogue.” The Navy, which says the settlement protects national security, argues that sonar is essential to detecting submarines from enemy states. Environmentalists counter that its piercing sounds harm and kill whales.

The Navy says sonar training is essential for sailors to be prepared to detect super-quiet diesel submarines that are being purchased or built by rogue Third World nations, including Iran.
The Navy says sonar training is essential for sailors to be prepared to detect super-quiet diesel submarines that are being purchased or built by rogue Third World nations, including Iran.   (AP Photo/US Navy - James R. Evan)
The Navy and several environmental groups settled a lawsuit that challenged the Navy's use of sonar around the globe as dangerous to whales and other marine mammals, the two sides said.
The Navy and several environmental groups settled a lawsuit that challenged the Navy's use of sonar around the globe as dangerous to whales and other marine mammals, the two sides said.   (AP Photo/Reed Saxon)
Environmentalists contend that the Navy's use of active sonar is hurting and perhaps killing whales by sending out high-pitched tones.
Environmentalists contend that the Navy's use of active sonar is hurting and perhaps killing whales by sending out high-pitched tones.   (AP Photo/ Cascadia Research Collective, Robin W. Baird)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The Navy is pleased that after more than three years of extensive litigation, this matter has been brought to an end on favorable terms. - Frank R. Jimenez, the Navy's general counsel

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
OFF THE GRID
11.24.09
Murdoch and Microsoft: The Mice Are Trying to Roar
11.23.09
Books Are Bad for You
1 comment
VIEWING:
 
kokuaguy
Dec 29, 08 1:06 AM CST
Since when are members of environmental groups "greenies"? I suppose those who believe in economic justice are "pinkos"? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 

Related Newser Stories

6 Stories

Climate Groups Look to Avoid Health Care Repeat

But administration reluctant to push climate legislation this year

Sep 21, 09 8:20 AM CDT
(Newser) - Environmental groups are struggling to convince Democrats that the fight for cap-and-trade legislation won’t be as damaging as the one over health care, and to keep them from punting on the issue, Politico reports. Climate supporters say they have a grass-roots network in place that health care reformers didn’... More »

MORE ABOUT:
climate change • health care • environment • cap and trade • environmentalists

 Green Groups Come 
 Down on 'Clean Coal' 

Gore calls the technology 'illusions of the industry'

Dec 5, 08 6:12 PM CST
(Newser) - A new advertising campaign backed by environmental organizations, including one supported by Al Gore, is calling into question the efficacy of “clean coal technology,” the Washington Post reports. “Clean coal” was a buzzword during this year’s election, but environmentalists think it’s an oxymoron. “We... More »

MORE ABOUT:
environment • Al Gore • advertising campaign • coal power • environmentalists • clean coal

 Supreme Court 
 OKs Navy Sonar 
 Near Whales 

5-4 decision sides with Bush administration

Nov 12, 08 12:49 PM CST
(Newser) - The Supreme Court sided 5-4 with the Bush administration today, exempting the Navy from switching off high-powered sonar near whales during training off California's coast. The piercing underwater sounds panic whales and make their ears bleed, environmentalists tell the Los Angeles Times. But the “public interest” in the exercises... More »

MORE ABOUT:
Bush administration • environment • Navy • US Supreme Court • sonar • whales

6 Stories


Supreme Court sides with Navy in similar case
Reuters

Environmentalists: how sonar hurts the whales
Natural Resources Defense Council


Science & Health  •  Crime & Courts  •  Technology 
TwitterFollow @NewserScience on Twitter

 
environment • Navy • sonar • whales • environmentalists

from our news partners