Print Times Not Quite Dead, But Hope Lies in Its Ashes
Journalism faces a challenge, but hardly a disaster
By Sarah Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted Jan 7, 2009 3:36 PM CST
The front page of Monday's New York Times was the first to contain an ad. Display advertising on the bottom of the front page is a trend becoming more common throughout the newspaper industry.   (AP Photo)

(Newser) – We know it’s coming, that day when print newspapers cease to exist, but it won’t be this year, right? Maybe, maybe not, Michael Hirschorn writes in the Atlantic, and it wouldn’t necessarily be a disaster. The New York Times is in trouble—it could default on $400 million in debt come May. “Sooner than most of us think,” the Times will be digital-only, Hirschorn predicts.

What would the non-paper paper look like? Only the best reporters would survive, and “could use their considerable savvy to mix their own reporting with that of others, giving us a more integrative, real-time view of the world.” With various sites coordinating resources, the Times would “resemble a bigger, better, and less partisan version of the Huffington Post,” Hirschorn writes.

View 2 more images
Next on Newser: Dow Down 245 on Jobs
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
You Might Like
Showing 1 of 1 comment
Jan 8, 2009 6:30 AM CST
Are you referring to Faux News? The ones who in 2004 portrayed John Kerry as a war criminal despite the several Silver Stars he was awarded; and portrayed George W. Bush as some kind of war hero despite the fact that he quit the National Guard his daddy got him in so he could avoid serving going overseas? Oh yeah, and in the 2008 campaign they reported that Barack Obama was a Muslim. Is that your idea of fair and balanced news? Well, here's some news for you: Your guys lost. Get over it!