Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Nate Silver: Win the Cities, Win America

Fast-growing urban demographic handed Obama election victory

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 15, 2009 8:54 PM CST

(Newser) – Barack Obama's strength in cities won him the election, meaning he "might be America's first urban" president, statistics whiz Nate Silver writes in Esquire. Obama's "pragmatic, superior, hip, stubborn, multicultural" ways make him unmistakably urban, Silver writes, and America's changing demographics mean that urban voters matter now more than ever.

The percentage of voters identified as rural has shriveled since 1992 while the urban percentage has risen steadily, Silver notes. Suburban voters now make up almost half the electorate, and they are starting to look—and vote—more like their urban counterparts. "Among the many mistakes the McCain campaign made was targeting the rural vote rather than the suburban one," Silver writes.

Barack Obama addresses a rally in the parking lot of Soldier Field before a presidential forum hosted by the AFL-CIO at the stadium in Chicago, Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2007.
Barack Obama addresses a rally in the parking lot of Soldier Field before a presidential forum hosted by the AFL-CIO at the stadium in Chicago, Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2007.   (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
Barack Obama takes a walking tour of downtown Vinton, Iowa, Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2007.
Barack Obama takes a walking tour of downtown Vinton, Iowa, Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2007.   (AP Photo/David Lienemann)
The image of Barack Obama is shown on a poster for sale Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2008, in downtown Denver.
The image of Barack Obama is shown on a poster for sale Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2008, in downtown Denver.   (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
John McCain and Sarah Palin's focus on small towns was no way to win an election in today's America, Nate Silver writes.
John McCain and Sarah Palin's focus on small towns was no way to win an election in today's America, Nate Silver writes.   (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Nate Silver explains the mission of his website, www.fivethirtyeight.com, at the DNC in Denver in August 2008.   (craignewmanCST)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »

If you are going to pit big cities against small towns, it is probably a mistake to end up on the rural side of the ledger. - Nate Silver

Barack Obama was elected partly in reaction to the failures of the previous one, a president who was dogmatic, insecure, white-bread, and—at least ostensibly— rural. - Nate Silver

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 4 comments
Guest
Jan 19, 2009 8:59 PM CST
Without researching it, I believe that there is a large number of rural poor on welfare, and much of it is in the red states... so how does that fit into your theory? Also, huge difference winning a state with the population of a million or two (or less, as the case of Alaska), and winning populous states, therefore your whole state count is a bunch of bull shit.. Seriously, there is statistics and there are lying statistics... which any first year stat student could tell you.
Caps
Jan 15, 2009 10:59 PM CST
Oh Corona-Queenie my dear, you are are so smart. It's sure is ashame it does not show.
Mr.C
Jan 15, 2009 10:17 PM CST
i thought winning cities just translated to winning the minorities

More Newser Stories

Detroit Bust Would've Been Better Than Bailout

Obama Unveils $3.8T Budget, Targets Rich

White House to Budge on Birth-Control Mandate

Small Donors Gave 48% of Obama's 2011 Donations

No Child Left Behind Waiver Granted to 10 States


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne