Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Leave Space to Robots

President Obama would be well-served by removing costly manned exploration goals

By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 24, 2009 2:58 AM CST

(Newser) – Barack Obama is poised to chart a new direction for America’s exploration of the final frontier, writes the Economist. While George W. Bush supported continuing manned space exploration in the tradition of the previous century, Obama is considering scrapping some of NASA’s planned upgrades to the space shuttle program. This would leave space exploration to the robots, an idea the Economist heartily endorses.

Obama may devote part of the space budget to scores of new satellites for monitoring earth, a “domestic policy” that gets another thumb-up from the magazine. But the recent discovery of methane on Mars shows that humans cannot completely abandon the galaxy’s outer reaches. With robots currently “better and cheaper” than ever, unmanned missions are the perfect way to keep exploration going for less money.

Data confirms there is methane in Mars' atmosphere, and while it's possible the gas is produced by biological sources, it behooves us to send robots, not humans, to find out, the Economist writes.
Data confirms there is methane in Mars' atmosphere, and while it's possible the gas is produced by biological sources, it behooves us to send robots, not humans, to find out, the Economist writes.   (NASA)
An engineering model of the 2009 Mars Science Laboratory, dubbed Scarecrow, makes its way down a hill in the Mars Yard at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
An engineering model of the 2009 Mars Science Laboratory, dubbed "Scarecrow," makes its way down a hill in the "Mars Yard" at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.   (NASA)
Unmanned vehicles are a much cheaper, safer way to explore outer space, writes the Economist; President Obama would do well to cut manned missions, given other priorities back on Earth.
Unmanned vehicles are a much cheaper, safer way to explore outer space, writes the Economist; President Obama would do well to cut manned missions, given other priorities back on Earth.   (NASA)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Robots ... can work tirelessly for years, beaming back data and images, and returning samples to Earth. They can also be made sterile, which germ-infested humans, who risk spreading disease around the solar system, cannot. - the Economist

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
Doctor-Zaius
Jan 25, 2009 6:19 AM CST
What if instead of climbing Mt. Everest or going to the South Pole we just put a picture taking probe there? How would that have inspired humanity?
riffran
Jan 24, 2009 8:46 PM CST
Hey greconquest...Please explain in detail how exploration of Mars now equates to neo-conservatism, and a deliberate effort to cause financial insecurity. Is this in actuality a true statement, or just a randomly injected rhetoric, in an attempt obfuscate?...Please elucidate, and reference sources, if at all possible.....Thank you
riffran
Jan 24, 2009 7:58 PM CST
Touche Good DR. Z. excellent point.

More Newser Stories

Obama Losing Super PAC War

Russia's Failed Mars Probe Will Crash to Earth

Under Obama, a Force of Killer Drones Evolved

Obama Won't Apologize for Pakistan Strike

Mars Rover 'Curiosity' Launches


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne