Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Save the Rainforest? Nature May Have It Covered

New jungle in the tropics might outpace deforestation

By Katherine Thompson,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 30, 2009 12:18 PM CST

(Newser) – With all the talk of how much primeval rainforest disappears every year, it might come as a surprise to hear that much more new forest is springing up to replace it. Although new jungle taking over abandoned or destroyed farms in tropical nations is good for the planet—the UN has begun the first major study of its impact—not all scientists agree that it can replace established rainforest, writes the New York Times.

Secondary forests grow quickly, and can soak up some of the carbon footprint caused by destruction of primary jungle, but their overall benefit depends heavily on when and where they grow. Animals whose Amazonian rainforest habitat is destroyed can't just pick up and move to Panama, and the secondary growth there might not be diverse enough anyway to support many local species.

Trees grow upon a fallen comrade in Santa Elena Preserve in Costa Rica. In neighboring Panama, people are moving to the cities and letting new forest spring up on their land.
Trees grow upon a fallen comrade in Santa Elena Preserve in Costa Rica. In neighboring Panama, people are moving to the cities and letting new forest spring up on their land.   (Flickr)
New forests can gain large trees in only a few years, but real biodiversity won't have had nearly enough time to set in at that point.
New forests can gain large trees in only a few years, but real biodiversity won't have had nearly enough time to set in at that point.   (Flickr)
The primeval rainforest in Kakum National Park, Ghana boasts 300 species of birds, unique monkeys and the highly endangered forest elephant and bongo antelope.
The primeval rainforest in Kakum National Park, Ghana boasts 300 species of birds, unique monkeys and the highly endangered forest elephant and bongo antelope.   (AP Photo/Olivier Asselin)
New forests can compensate for the loss of older ones in terms of curbing carbon dioxide emissions, but new jungle in Panama won't help endangered animals whose Peruvian forest is destroyed.
New forests can compensate for the loss of older ones in terms of curbing carbon dioxide emissions, but new jungle in Panama won't help endangered animals whose Peruvian forest is destroyed.   (Flickr)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Biologists were ignoring these huge population trends and acting as if only original forest has conservation value, and that’s just wrong. - Joe Wright, a senior scientist at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

This is a caricature of a rain forest! There’s no canopy, there’s too much light, there are only a few species. - Bill Laurance, a Smithsonian scientist who doesn't believe overgrown land is as valuable as established forest

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
Shannonals
Feb 4, 2009 3:22 AM CST
Don't destory the rainforest I need my air
Guest
Feb 1, 2009 5:16 AM CST
I knew that was a jungle I saw out of my 10 story window.
Guest
Jan 30, 2009 3:21 AM CST
"abandoned or destroyed" farms. It takes a global economic downturn for the slightest increase in benefit. Not if capitalism has anything to say...
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne