Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Are We Sure It Was a Fumble?

Did the Cards get hosed?

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 2, 2009 10:16 AM CST

(Newser) – With 5 seconds left, Kurt Warner dropped back hoping for a miracle. Instead, he got nailed by Lamar Woodley, the ball came loose, and just like that, Super Bowl XLIII had its defining controversy. If Warner’s arm was moving forward—and it looked like it was—the play should have been ruled an incomplete pass. Instead it was ruled a fumble, robbing the Cards of one last chance to score.

But the real controversy isn’t the call, it’s the lack of official review, Jonathan Cohn writes in the New Republic. With less than two minutes left, any review would have had to come from the booth, but despite the Cardinals' protests, Pittsburgh’s offense was on the field within seconds for the winning snap. The Steelers would probably have won anyway, Cohn allows, but “if I were an Arizona fan—surely there are a few out there—I’d be angry.”

Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner throws up a fumble(?) as he is hit by Pittsburgh Steelers LaMarr Woodley during the final seconds of Super Bowl XLIII, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2009.
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner throws up a fumble(?) as he is hit by Pittsburgh Steelers LaMarr Woodley during the final seconds of Super Bowl XLIII, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2009.   (AP Photo/St. Petersburg Times, Dirk Shadd)
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner walks off the field after the Pittsburgh Steelers defeated the Arizona Cardinals 27-23 in Super Bowl XLIII , Feb. 1, 2009.
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner walks off the field after the Pittsburgh Steelers defeated the Arizona Cardinals 27-23 in Super Bowl XLIII , Feb. 1, 2009.   (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
The Cardinals' final drive. (Fateful fumble comes at the 4:30 mark)   (juang4u79)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 4 comments
Forderon
Feb 3, 2009 1:37 AM CST
Come on*
Forderon
Feb 3, 2009 1:36 AM CST
Rugby has an oblong ball, so does football. Rugby has a field goal, so does football. Rugby has a scrimmage, so does football. Rugby has violent tackling, so does football. Rugby has punting, so does football. Come, you don't see any way that rugby directly influenced football?
Guest
Feb 2, 2009 3:42 AM CST
Now I am a fan of rugby, and of soccer. But football is about as stolen from rugby as basketball is stolen from soccer. There are a few similarities, but nowhere close to any copyright violations. And remember, it is only in the past 40 years or so since players drinking on the sidelines has been prohibited, so give us a bit more time to get the rules straight.

More Newser Stories

Super Bowl XLIII in Photos

The Game Is in Warner's Hands

Super Bowl Inspires Super Wacky Wagers

Recession Dims Super Bowl Glitz

Super Bowl Awash in Subplots


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne