Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Dems Gird for Fight Over Pro-Labor Bill

'Card check' legislation faces stiff business opposition, Senate fight

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 5, 2009 10:41 AM CST

(Newser) – House Democrats are about to unveil a bill easing the unionization process, a measure that’s already sparked major backlash, the Hill reports. The Employee Free Choice Act, which President Obama has said he'll sign, would allow workers to skip secret ballot elections to create unions, instead openly signing cards. But businesses are advertising against the bill, and the Chamber of Commerce has spent some $10 million fighting it.

Businesses say the measure could let labor bosses push unwilling workers into unions and could spur more strikes. But advocates say the bill would protect workers from employer intimidation and would boost the economy by helping raise wages. The bill is likely to pass the House but faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where it has failed before with 51 votes; 60 votes are needed to beat a filibuster.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., right, talks with Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Sept. 7, 2007. Both have sponsored versions of the Employee Free Choice Act.
Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., right, talks with Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Sept. 7, 2007. Both have sponsored versions of the Employee Free Choice Act.   (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., listens as House Education and Labor Committee Chairman Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., right, whispers during a news conference.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., listens as House Education and Labor Committee Chairman Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., right, whispers during a news conference.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We're going to have to fight, turn up the heat, turn up the pressure. I am determined we will not lose this fight, by two votes or one vote. - Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
Guest
Feb 5, 2009 4:38 AM CST
I never understood why it was so easy to convince the media that the working union members were the enemy and yet the millionaire executives who steer the companies into the abyss barely get a mention. I say couple this bill with an Executive Ban bill -- BAN executives and after that, limit unions. That's the only way to limit the power the executives have over non-unionized workers, or union workers who still do not get to see their biggest payday the day they get fired, unlike many executives. So it's ok to diminish the power of unions when no one at a company makes more than a blue collar worker at that company. It's not as if those white collars are doing a good job anyways. So much for all that education and all those connections...
Guest
Feb 5, 2009 2:55 AM CST
"Organizing against the working class'? What kind of company do you work at? Sounds like a branch office of Mr. Scrooge. I have a hard time identifying with you or the unions. My company has a positive relationship with its employees and provides profit sharing, a discount employee stock purchase program, company paid pension plan and a 401-k plan with employer contributions, paid health care.....the list goes on. Organize against THAT? Are you nuts? The first appearance of a labor organizer and the employees at my company would throw the guy out head first! I am sure that are some places where the situation is reversed but understand that even in many of the companies laying off, they were good employers who did right by their employees and unions are not needed or wanted in good companies. Employees NEVER vote FOR unions. They only vote AGAINST bad management. As more and more comapnies over the past 50 years got that fact and got that good management meant doing right by it's employees which resulted in the employees rejecting unions, more companies climbed on the good management bandwagon. probably why we saw an explosion in management books and management schools to profit from this sudden interest in managing well for better profits and higher productivity. It doesn't have to be a us vs. them equation and most businesess understand that. It is in the interests of unions to keep the us vs. them concept alive and well. Otherwise they continue to lose membership and die as an entity. Most Americans think unions have outlived their usefullness already. I would much rather have profit sharing than pay union dues. Especially when that union gives my dues money to polticians I dislike.
Guest
Feb 5, 2009 1:29 AM CST
I dont understand how for so long businesses had the freedom to reap huge profits yet organized labor was seen a the enemy. If capitalists can organize against the working class than whats wrong with workers organizing against the businesses? Honest question...

More Newser Stories

Lawmaker: McCain Killed Soldier Counseling

House Dems Fear Senate, WH Steamroll on Health Care

Byrd: Rename Health Bill for Kennedy

Aug. Health Reform Looks Impossible

Specter's Shift May Doom Bill on Union Organizing


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne