Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
11

Sorry, Greenies, Americans Still Like Sprawl

Share

(Newser) – When urban planners dream, they dream that Americans will give up on the suburbs in favor of a dense, environmentally friendly, less auto-dependent lifestyle. And it’s never going to happen, David Brooks writes in the New York Times. “Amsterdam is a wonderful city, but Americans never seem to want to live there.” According to a recent Pew study, cities are among the least popular places to live for Americans, who still yearn to sprawl outward.

Young people still find cities appealing—45% of 18- to 34-year-olds would like to live in New York City—but no one else does. The metro areas people most wanted to live in were Western places like Denver, Phoenix, or Seattle,“where you can imagine yourself with a stuffed garage, filled with skis, kayaks, soccer equipment, and boating equipment,” Brooks observes. It’s “the American Dream circa 2009.”

Denver's skyline is seen at sunset in this file photo.
Denver's skyline is seen at sunset in this file photo.   (Shutterstock)
Ah, the American dream.
Ah, the American dream.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Americans may indeed be gloomy and hunkered down. But they’re still Americans. They are still drawn to virgin ground, still restless
against limits. - David Brooks

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
11 comments
VIEWING:
 
riffran
Feb 17, 09 11:57 AM CST
I'll stick to my 6 acres out in the country....8 miles from town.....The concept of living in an apartment building or condo is as alien to me as a born and bred New Yorker, would feel about not being in one...The way I was raised is that the "city" is where you go to shop for things you cant get locally....I lived in San Diego, and L.A., Long Beach, but it aint home Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Snowleopard
Feb 17, 09 12:34 PM CST
I live in Portland Oregon, and I think they've kinda hit a sweet spot with the city living. I've heard a lot that it's a big city with a bit of that small town feel. I like how the city is broken into all these neighborhoods, where you can walk or bike to all this little cafes, shop, and restaurants, but you're not forced to live in super tight apartment complexes. Also, I don't think Brook's article is entirely accurate, because a lot of these cities he refers too just aren't that livable close in (traffic, crime, pollution, etc). Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
proxieme2
Feb 17, 09 1:39 PM CST
Exactly re: snow's comment. I couldn't imagine living in most of NYC, but a nice, pedestrian/bike/transit-friendly city with greenspace and close-in suburbs with distinct neighborhoods...that's doable.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
radnip
Feb 17, 09 1:44 PM CST
Sardine-can living is inevitable if population isn't addressed. Some economists think 6 square feet is more than enough for a human to live in. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
dolcevita
Feb 17, 09 3:25 PM CST
I love open space, and green space. i also love space used well. dense urban populations are not appealing but neither is sprawl. my definition of sprawl is poorly used space, paved over, willy-nilly cul-de-sac subdivisions, strip malls, large industrial/commercial sheds...with no consideration for walkability, connectedness, community, just consumption. can't stand high-rises. love parks and trees and local diners/cafes. long commutes and heavy traffic and crowds are dealbreakers. the energy of a place is important, as is clean air, water, peace, quiet, nature. i have lived rurally, suburban, urban. my home is now chicago proper. well-built brick buildings with my feet close to the ground, old trees outside the window, good neighbors, half a block from 3 parks, and living close enough to get around but not on a busy street, make for pretty good living. i used to work in the neighborhood, too, so my commute was a 10 minute drive or a 30 minute walk. sweet! although i live 6 miles from downtown it takes 45-75 minutes on the train to get there, one-way, which i find unacceptable. mass transit efficiency is still lacking in chicago. it should not take the same amount of time to sit in traffic driving to the suburbs as it does to travel 6 miles within the city! all the more reason that neighborhoods should support their own populations, so that residents don't need to haul across town for supplies. and for the record, i do not eat fast food nor drink coffee so neither MacDonalds nor Starbucks holds any appeal for me. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.