Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


8

Airport Body Scanners May Replace Metal Detectors

Share

(Newser) – Full-body scanners may eventually replace standard metal detectors at airports, USA Today reports. The feds are experimenting with machines that look through clothing for hidden guns or bombs—especially those made of plastic that can elude metal detectors. Tulsa's airport has the scanners now, and San Francisco, Las Vegas, Miami, Albuquerque, and Salt Lake City will soon join the test. Privacy advocates aren't thrilled.

"We're getting closer and closer to a required strip-search to board an airplane," said an ACLU spokesman. The $170,000 machines—much pricier than the $10,000 metal detectors—show the outlines of body parts to screeners in separate rooms. "(It) really does not reveal as much as some people might think," said one airport security chief. Maybe more worrisome: The scans take 30 seconds, about twice as long as the current screening. No word on when the TSA will make its decision.

Passengers send their luggage through a screen and get ready to pass through a metal detector themselves. TSA is experimenting now with full-body scanners.
Passengers send their luggage through a screen and get ready to pass through a metal detector themselves. TSA is experimenting now with full-body scanners.   (AP Photo/Will Kirk)
In this 2007 file photo, officers screen carry-on baggage at Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Body scans may be next.
In this 2007 file photo, officers screen carry-on baggage at Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Body scans may be next.   (AP Photo/Will Kirk)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
8 comments
VIEWING:
 
SPH
Feb 18, 09 8:17 PM CST
Require people to fly naked...Airlines could increase revenue on blanket rental.... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Collusive
Feb 18, 09 9:07 PM CST
the terrorists did a great job at taking away our freedom. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
AClotfelter
Feb 18, 09 9:15 PM CST
"(It) really does not reveal as much as some people might think," I have heard this from screeners at airports, and this must be one of the talking points... the other being that it "blurs out" the "private area". I'm sorry, but that is bullshit... if it were true, the machines would be useless, because every criminal would just hide whatever near their crotch. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
tmoore
Feb 18, 09 11:42 PM CST
It does show a somewhat simplified dataset to the screeners... but the level of detail that the machine reads is quite high.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Shannonals
Feb 18, 09 10:01 PM CST
I would feel quite better Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.