Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


5

EPA Expected to Start Limiting CO2 Emissions

Agency will act on ignored Supreme Court ruling

Share

(Newser) – The EPA is expected to soon start regulating emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases for the first time, reports the New York Times. The agency is under an order—ignored by the Bush administration—to decide whether CO2 is a pollutant that endangers the public. Obama administration officials have signaled that an affirmative decision will be forthcoming within weeks.

The move would give the EPA broad powers to limit emissions under the Clean Air Act. Critics, including some Democrats, complain that would create a "glorious mess" of regulations. Environmentalists say the decision is long overdue, although they see EPA regulation as just a stopgap measure until Congress can create more comprehensive climate change legislation. There is expectation that EPA administrator Lisa Jackson will act by April 2, the second anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling.

Sunflower Electric Cooperative's coal-fired power plant churns out electricity in this Friday, Feb. 2, 2007 file photo in Holcomb, Kan.
Sunflower Electric Cooperative's coal-fired power plant churns out electricity in this Friday, Feb. 2, 2007 file photo in Holcomb, Kan.   (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel )
Under the clean air law any source, from factories to schools to bakeries, emitting over 250 tons of a pollutant is subject to regulation, leading some critics to call it the 'Dunkin Donuts Act.'
Under the clean air law any source, from factories to schools to bakeries, emitting over 250 tons of a pollutant is subject to regulation, leading some critics to call it the 'Dunkin Donuts Act.'   (©darkensiva)
EPA administrator Lisa Jackson says the Supreme Court requiring the EPA to decide whether CO2 is a pollutant puts the agency at the center of the national discussion on climate and energy.
EPA administrator Lisa Jackson says the Supreme Court requiring the EPA to decide whether CO2 is a pollutant puts the agency at the center of the national discussion on climate and energy.   (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Potentially, it’s a huge mess, not only for EPA but for state regulatory agencies, because the Clean Air Act is second only to the Internal Revenue Code in terms of complexity. - Jeffrey R. Holmstead, former head of the agency’s office of air and radiation

We are loudly advocating for tailor-made legislation as the best means of addressing carbon emissions. Trying to address climate change via a series of rule makings from EPA is a distant second best. - David Bookbinder, chief climate counsel at the Sierra Club

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
OFF THE GRID
11.24.09
Murdoch and Microsoft: The Mice Are Trying to Roar
11.23.09
Books Are Bad for You
5 comments
VIEWING:
 
PaleRider
Feb 19, 09 10:31 AM CST
Because CO2 is poisoning the plants! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Forderon
Feb 19, 09 10:56 AM CST
Are you completely ignorant of how the climate works or are you just trying to be annoying? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
riffran
Feb 20, 09 2:31 AM CST
I do beleive Fergola was employing some subtle sharp witted sarcasm..(funny as hell.I might add .lol )....but the article did have one point I thought was very true....."Critics, including some Democrats, complain that would create a "glorious mess" of regulations.".....If anybody out there has had to deal with medicare/medicade, EPA standards, and other Govt. regulated areas, the red tape is a fricken nightmare, and the nightmare varies from state to state, county to county......confusing to the point of near nonfunctionality Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
radnip
Feb 20, 09 4:34 AM CST
Why bother? Global warming will help humans with our population problem. It saves people from actually thinking. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
riffran
Feb 22, 09 4:35 AM CST
one school of thought, is with more water on the planet in a liquid state, there would be more rainfall and overall vegitation would increase, removing more CO2, and buffering the system.....but the resultant land loss may increase the population density per square mile, and destroy the very vegitation that would be the saving grace....but that is one of many unproven theories Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 

Related Newser Stories

34 Stories

 'Counterproductive' 
 Offsets Ditched 

Green flying schemes salve consciences, not environment

Nov 18, 09 2:54 AM CST
(Newser) - Carbon offsets are becoming big business, but many emissions experts say green travel is too good to be true. Responsible Travel was one of the first travel firms to offer customers the chance to pay extra money to help offset emissions caused by their air miles. But it has now... More »

MORE ABOUT:
climate change • carbon dioxide • carbon offsets • air travel • carbon emissions

EPA Gets Nod to Crack Down on Industrial Greenhouse Gas

Big industrial plants to be targeted, not 'cows and Dunkin' Donuts'

Oct 1, 09 5:51 AM CDT
(Newser) - The Obama administration has given the EPA the green light to start moving for the first time toward limiting greenhouse-gas emissions from major industrial sources. The proposed new rules would affect only large facilities that emit 25,000 tons or more of carbon dioxide annually, instead of applying to "... More »

MORE ABOUT:
greenhouse gases • carbon dioxide • Environmental Protection Agency • EPA • greenhouse-gas emissions • Obama administration • Lisa Jackson

(Newser) - Facing broad new US regulations on emissions, big business wants to put the science behind global warming before a judge, the Los Angeles Times reports. “It would be evolution versus creationism,” says an executive for the US Chamber of Commerce, which is pushing the idea of a public... More »

MORE ABOUT:
climate change • evolution • global warming • science • creationism • Environmental Protection Agency • emissions standards • big business • carbon emissions • Scopes monkey trial • US Chamber of Commerce

34 Stories


EPA may roll back Bush policy on coal plants
Washington Post


Science & Health 
TwitterFollow @NewserScience on Twitter

 
climate change • carbon dioxide • Clean Air Act • Environmental Protection Agency • carbon emissions • EPA • greenhouse-gas emissions • Obama administration • Lisa Jackson

from our news partners