Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


6

Supreme Court Limits Power of Voting Rights Act

Share

(AP) – The Supreme Court ruled today that a part of the Voting Rights Act aimed at helping minorities elect their preferred candidates only applies in electoral districts where minorities make up more than half the population, the AP reports. The decision could make it harder for some minority candidates to win election and for southern Democrats, in particular, to draw friendly electoral boundaries after the 2010 Census.

The 5-4 decision, led by conservatives, came in the case of a North Carolina plan that sought to preserve the influence of African-American voters by ensuring that new districts can't be drawn in a way that reduces their political clout—even though they make up only 39% of the district. The high court ruled in favor of North Carolina law, which dictates that voting districts can't split up counties.

The US Supreme Court is shown February 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.
The US Supreme Court is shown February 5, 2009 in Washington, DC.   (Getty Images)
Voters stand in line to vote at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.
Voters stand in line to vote at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.   (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)
Voters stand in line at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.
Voters stand in line at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.   (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)
Djuana Belk-Massey looks over a sample ballot as she stands in line to vote at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.
Djuana Belk-Massey looks over a sample ballot as she stands in line to vote at an early voting site in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Oct. 23, 2008.   (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
jeebus
Mar 9, 09 9:25 PM CDT
Of course Clearance Slappy sambo uncle tom Thomas voted against black peoples rights again. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
freethemall
Mar 9, 09 10:26 PM CDT
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but it seems to me that in a truly non- racists society it wouldn't matter weather a person of a particular race was represented by a person of his own race or not. as I say, I could be wrong enlighten if you think I am wrong. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
jeebus
Mar 9, 09 11:30 PM CDT
When you are the first person of your race to be elected or appointed to a particular position, you represent your race whether you like it or not. Clearance Thomas is doing a rather piss poor job of representing black people in any way, shape or form.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
SPH
Mar 10, 09 12:37 PM CDT
Gerrymandering has been a political tradition in this country for a long time....I don't think this is as much a racial problem as it is a political one...Specifically, I believe that this is an attempt by a certain desperate political party to retain a little influence.... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
northeast
Mar 10, 09 8:01 PM CDT
Read the case brief. At that point, you'll understand why it is that you're completely right on the gerrymandering charge but wrong on the GOP insinuation.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 

Copyright 2009 Newser, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. AP contributed to this report.