Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


18

Scientists Seek 'Shadow' Life Forms on Earth

Share

(Newser) – "If aliens exist, they may be living right next door..." No, it's not a writer pitching a television pilot, but the premise of a scientific theory called the "shadow biosphere," New Scientist reports. Some astrobiologists say that life forms may have originated on Earth after our own, and endured, unnoticed. "I think if we found a second sample of life on Earth, it would be as big as Darwin's theory of evolution," said one scientist.

Skeptics have issues. New life forms—most likely in molecule form—would be eaten up on our crowded Earth, they say. Or if they did endure, their bizarre biochemistries would be hard to detect. But "shadow biosphere" believers are encouraged by the fact that less than 1% of microbes have been identified. So they're busy hunting for alien life in extreme environments, like ice sheets and ultra-dry deserts.

Researchers visit Norway's Troll Research Station in Antarctica on Monday, Feb. 23, 2009.
Researchers visit Norway's Troll Research Station in Antarctica on Monday, Feb. 23, 2009.   (AP Photo/Charles J.Hanley)
The poster for John Carpenter's film,
The poster for John Carpenter's film, "The Thing."   (MovieWeb)
Researchers visit Norway's Troll Research Station in Antarctica on Monday, Feb. 23, 2009.
Researchers visit Norway's Troll Research Station in Antarctica on Monday, Feb. 23, 2009.   (AP Photo/Charles J. Hanley)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
18 comments
VIEWING:
 
riffran
Mar 13, 09 7:47 PM CDT
OOOOOOO Kay...... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
ethical_person
Mar 13, 09 8:14 PM CDT
... "shadow biosphere" believers are encouraged by the fact that less than 1% of microbes have been identified." Hey Newser: If you are going to position yourself as a journalism news site, then you should learn proper grammar -- it's important, since there are a lot of people coming here who learn their facts and their grammar from you! Should read: "...fact that fewer than 1% of microbes " I'm just saying . . . Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
JonmarkP
Mar 13, 09 10:09 PM CDT
Newser, he's right. This is journalism, not the checkout line at Wal-Mart.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
NutsInNY
Mar 14, 09 8:49 AM CDT
jonmarkp, "right" is a strong word. There will always be those folks out there who think the fabric of our society is being torn apart if some little rule about the English language that they have grown attached to is broken! However, in the English language, such *prescriptivism" is foolhardy; unlike other languages of European origin, the beauty of English is that there has never been a centralized authority dictating what is "wrong" and what is "right"... what is "right" is, in fact, what people use and understand, which clearly makes the objection above a bit petty. However, if you wish to live following the rules given in a journalism style guide, that is your choice. But be careful not to be too self-righteous about throwing those rules at others, esp. when the language used is perfectly clear to the majority. In English, the majority rules... if you don't like it, move to France where your choice of language must be approved by L'Académie française.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
sanagalrc
Mar 14, 09 4:27 PM CDT
Should read "If thou art going to position thyself as a site of journalism news, then thou shouldeth learn to speak properly." Seriously, there's a reason we don't talk like this anymore: language evolves.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.