Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Uproar After NC State Agent 'Fixes' Girl's Lunch Preschooler has to eat chicken nuggets instead of mom's meal »

Health Care Debate Turns Nastier

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Mar 21, 2009 12:45 PM CDT

(Newser) – The claws have come out in the Capitol Hill debate on whether the government should create a public insurance plan to compete with private insurers, Politico reports. One of the first tangible signs begins today with an advocacy group's TV ad campaign against Sen. Charles Grassley in his home state of Iowa. Grassley has been the most vocal opponent of a public plan, arguing the government is “an unfair competitor” that would run private companies out of business.

“He was the only one who injected that deep policy disagreement,” said an official at union giant AFSCME, which backs a public plan. “It was a wake-up call to people on both sides to begin the discussion.” AFSCME, meanwhile, recently severed ties with a coalition of insurers and consumer advocates seeking compromise. Though any GOP-supported public plan is likely a pipe dream, Grassley said he would for the time being “take the same approach the president takes,” which is wait and see.

President Barack Obama.
President Barack Obama.   (AP Photo)
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Private health insurance companies have been in control for too long. They decide who you can see, what’s covered and what’s not. What if you had a choice?

- Ad campaign for a public plan

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 6 comments
wbdace
Jun 8, 2009 4:49 AM CDT
I agree about the profit motive, I'm fortunate to belong to a non-profit HMO. The government should do all it can to encourage non-profits.
freethemall
Mar 22, 2009 2:09 AM CDT
It is my understanding that a large majority of Canadiens are happy with their health care system. I don't think the same can be said of us. But you can bet your sweet tushy that those benefiting from the status quo will fight, tooth and nail, against any meaningful change. They did just that, to defeat health car reform championed by the Clintons.
Toon
Mar 21, 2009 10:47 AM CDT
Yes because the monied class are gentle folk unused to being attacked for their simple need to maintain their traditional culture of shopping, travel and fine art patronage.

More Newser Stories

No More Co-Pay for Birth Control: Obama

White House Offers Another $6.5B in Cuts

GOP Pushes to Outlaw Presidential 'Czars'

White House Caves, Will Extend Bush Tax Cuts

Bachmann Rules House Wingnuts Index


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne