DC Still Turns Blind Eye to Banks: Spitzer
Regulators attempt to save face after failing to prevent crisis
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Apr 1, 2009 11:38 AM CDT
Then-New York Gov. Elliot Spitzer announces his resignation as his wife Silda looks on Wednesday, March 12, 2008, in his offices in New York City.   (AP Photo/Stephen Chernin)

(Newser) – There’s a reason the government seems to have no control—darn the luck—over the banks it’s poured billions into: It’s trying to save face, writes Eliot Spitzer for Slate. Washington has struck a tacit bargain with Wall Street, the ex-governor says: Taxpayers bail out the financial institutions, changing nothing about them, and in return banks “perpetuate the myth that regulators didn’t have enough power to prevent the meltdown.”

The truth is, regulators had all the power they needed. The ratings agencies, commercial banks, and investment banks that really wrecked the system are “squarely in Washington’s regulatory sweet spot.” But, seduced by the bubble economy, regulators did nothing. Now they’re asking for more power over hedge funds, as though that was the problem all along. It wasn’t. Then, as now, regulators simply refused to act.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
You Might Like
Showing 1 of 1 comment
Apr 1, 2009 5:14 AM CDT
Wow, how insightful of him. When you hear it from Spitzer, you could almost forget which party did the bulk of the bailing.