Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
7

Animal Rights No Longer for Vegetarians Only

Share

(Newser) – Electing a black man president wasn’t the only historic thing voters did last November, writes Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times. California voted, by nearly a 2-1 margin, for an animal-rights initiative that bars farms from keeping calves, pregnant hogs, or hens in cages too small for them. And such ethical-treatment initiatives are gaining momentum across the US and Europe, 30 years after Princeton philosopher Peter Singer raised the issue of our moral obligations to animals.

“There’s some growth in numbers of vegetarians, but the bigger thing is a broad acceptance of the idea that animals count,” Singer tells Kristof. “For most of history, all of this would have been unimaginable even to people of the most refined ethical sensibility,” writes Kristof. Then again, “those refined ethicists were also untroubled by slavery.”

Members of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) pose for the media during an anti-fur demonstration in front of a fur store in Seoul, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008.
Members of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) pose for the media during an anti-fur demonstration in front of a fur store in Seoul, Friday, Sept. 19, 2008.   (AP Photo/ Lee Jin-man)
In this Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008 file photo, chickens huddle in their cages at an egg processing plant at the Dwight Bell Farm in Atwater, Calif.
In this Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2008 file photo, chickens huddle in their cages at an egg processing plant at the Dwight Bell Farm in Atwater, Calif.   (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)
Nathan Runkle, executive director of the animal rights group Mercy for Animals, talks about an undercover video showing chickens at a major California egg farm being mistreated by workers.
Nathan Runkle, executive director of the animal rights group Mercy for Animals, talks about an undercover video showing chickens at a major California egg farm being mistreated by workers.   (AP Photo/Steve Yeater)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? - Jeremy Bentham, in response to Kant's disinterest in animals

For my part, I eat meat, but I would prefer that this practice not inflict gratuitous suffering. - Nicholas Krisof

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
7 comments
VIEWING:
 
Robert_Dada
Apr 9, 09 10:19 AM CDT
Every now and then, a sliver of enlightenment presents itself. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
SPH
Apr 9, 09 1:49 PM CDT
And other times there Michael Vick.....
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Raggle_Fraggle
Apr 9, 09 1:48 PM CDT
I'm all for ethical, humane treatment, but not vegetarianism. I like that law. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Mad
Apr 9, 09 2:31 PM CDT
So, Cali voted FOR humane treatment of animals, yet AGAINST gay marriages. Hmmmmmmmmmmm Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Monjubikahn
Oct 29, 09 6:05 PM CDT
It was more a vote against the morphing of the Psychosocial Communal Consciousness toward a less than natural orientation that does not fulfill the natural genesis of community and nation.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.