Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook

Uproar After NC State Agent 'Fixes' Girl's Lunch Preschooler has to eat chicken nuggets instead of mom's meal »

Banking Should Go Back to Being Boring

By Kevin Spak, Newser Staff

Posted Apr 10, 2009 9:20 AM CDT

(Newser) – When Paul Krugman was in grad school, nobody wanted to be a banker. Sure, it paid more than being an academic economist, but “everyone knew that banking was, well, boring,” he writes in the New York Times. That was before deregulation came into vogue in the 1980s, turning finance into an exciting and vastly lucrative business…and, incidentally, “a monster that ate the world economy.”

The last time banking was that exciting was in the high-flying, debt-laden decades ahead of the Great Depression. After that catastrophe, regulators swooped in and made banking the plodding, dependable beast it was until the 1980s’ deregulation wave. Do today’s politicians, flush with Wall Street campaign contributions, have the will to bring the boring back? “If not, the current crisis won’t be a one-time event,” says Krugman. “It will be the shape of things to come.”

[Images (3)]

[Quotes (1)]

Banking became boring again following the Great Depression. (Getty Images)

January 1940: A teller at work in a bank in Creedmore, North Carolina. (Getty Images)

1951: An automatic currency dispensing machine devised by an American Bank President in Chicago. (Getty Images)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Despite everything that has happened, most people in positions of power still associate fancy finance with economic progress. - Paul Krugman

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

To report an error on this story, notify our editors.

More Newser Stories

World's New Banking Rules Are 'Welcome Stuff'

Tough standards are more than lip service

(NEWSER) - The new rules for the world's banking industry emerging from Switzerland today have some real bite to them, writes Felix Salmon at his Reuters financial blog . In broad strokes, banks will be required to hold more capital in reserve to fend off another meltdown. Banks complain that the new standards—also designed to keep them from stockpiling the risky debt blamed for the current mess—will drive down profits and raise the cost of credit for customers. (Details at the Wall Street Journal and the Guardian .) More»

It's 1938 All Over Again

And World War II isn't walking through that door

(NEWSER) - The US economy has been crippled by financial crisis, and the president’s too-cautious policies have failed to stem the bleeding. More stimulus is needed, but the public has soured on spending and plans to kick Democrats out of office. Sound familiar? That was the situation in 1938, writes Paul Krugman of the New York Times . And this time, World War II’s not walking through that door to save us. More»

Let's Face It: It's a Depression

Savage cuts when governments should be spending will prove the fatal blow

(NEWSER) - Paul Krugman uses the D word today, arguing that we're now in the early stages of a third depression. It may turn out to be more like the Long Depression of the 19th century than the dreaded Great Depression, but that's not going to offer much succor to the legions of unemployed who are likely to stay that way for years to come. And it's a failure of policy, he adds, with world leaders scrambling to assert "fiscal responsibility" when they should be boosting spending to promoting recovery. More»

Republicans Want to Abolish Financial Firemen

McConnell is doing Wall Street's bidding

(NEWSER) - Mitch McConnell wants to abolish fire departments—they just bail out burning buildings. We won’t get out of this mess until the biggest buildings are allowed to burn! That’s essentially what McConnell’s latest assault on financial reform amounts to, writes Paul Krugman in the New York Times . The Senate minority leader’s been ranting that reform will lead to perpetual bailouts. He's wrong. More»

Financial Reform: 'Punks' Take on Plutocrats

GOP argument against reform is upside-down, writes Paul Krugman

(NEWSER) - With financial reform on deck, Senate Republicans are busily figuring out how many "can get away with claiming that war is peace and regulating big banks is doing those big banks a favor," writes Paul Krugman in the New York Times . Alabama's Richard Shelby is portraying efforts to rein in big banks as a bailout, and John Boehner recently urged bankers to stand up to Congress and "not let those little punk staffers take advantage of you." But in this case, Krugman says, it's those "punks" who are looking out for the taxpayer. More»

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS

What is Newser?

Face it: there's too much news. At Newser, we choose the most thought-provoking and entertaining stories from hundreds of US and international sources and reduce them to a headline, picture, and two paragraphs. And we do it 24/7—you can come back morning, noon, night (and in between) for something new that matters. Read less, know more.

Learn more »

Partnering with: Slate

View Newser on the mobile website