Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


8

Vermont May Legalize Sexting—Between Teens

Bill moving through legislature to legalize sexually explicit teen communications

Share

(Newser) – Vermont’s state government is in an awkward position. Current law has the state prosecuting teens who send sexually explicit pictures of themselves to each other—sexting—as sex offenders. The state Senate has passed a bill to exempt an exchange of images between people between 13 and 18 years old from classification as child pornography, reports the Burlington Free Press, and the state House will take up the bill this week.

Not that legislators like it. “This isn’t an issue of whether it’s a good thing or a bad thing—I think it’s wrong—but the question is, do we want kids to be prosecuted, called sex offenders,” asks a state senator. That's why legalization has gotten broad support from prosecutors, defense attorneys, law enforcement, and women’s groups. The lawyer for one teen on trial for a sexting-related offense agrees. “It seems ridiculous to hold someone criminally responsible for an otherwise mundane act.”

Tyler Barnett begins to write a text message on his cell phone in Los Angeles on Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2009.
Tyler Barnett begins to write a text message on his cell phone in Los Angeles on Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2009.   (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The technology makes it
the crime. The act here is
sending the photo. There’s
no sexual act performed - T.J. Donovan, Chittenden County
State's Attorney

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
8 comments
VIEWING:
 
freethemall
Apr 14, 09 12:40 PM CDT
Back in the seventy's, when my sons were children, we took pictures of them nude in the bathtub, obviously totally innocent. This is also considered child porn, believe it or not. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
SPH
Apr 14, 09 1:15 PM CDT
The problem with the "tough on crime" gang is, and always will be, the lack of flexibility and disregard for common sense....But it sells in Peoria.... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
freethemall
Apr 14, 09 1:21 PM CDT
You got that right, SPH. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
justme
Apr 14, 09 7:20 PM CDT
So where do you draw the line? What if these same shots are collected and sold to pedophiles? What if these include the addresses of the kids? Less scary perhaps but what if the shots are just past around to embarrass the youngsters involved? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
radnip
Apr 17, 09 5:59 AM CDT
What if they're sold to artists? Is being naked that bad? Why isn't it about catching the predators and not about limiting everybody?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.