Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Shakespeare Debate Splits Supreme Court

Stevens finds alternate author theory beyond a reasonable doubt

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 18, 2009 8:08 AM CDT

(Newser) – John Paul Stevens and Antonin Scalia don’t agree often, but the justices are united on one case: Neither believes Shakespeare’s plays could possibly have been written by a hick like William Shakespeare. Stevens has even written papers on the topic, and searched the Bard’s home for clues. “The evidence…is beyond reasonable doubt,” he tells the Wall Street Journal. But his theory—that Edward de Vere, the 17th earl of Oxford, penned the plays—isn’t a popular one.

“I’m not impressed with the Oxfordian theory,” says Anthony Kennedy, who, together with Stephen Breyer, believes in the guy from Stratford. No other justice would rule on the case, so the Journal turned to retired justice—and frequent swing vote—Sandra Day O’Connor. “I’m not going to jump into this and be decisive,” she said, but when pressed added, “It might well have been someone other than our Stratford man.”

A newly discovered portrait of William Shakespeare is seen in central London, March 9, 2009. The portrait is believed to be almost the only authentic image of the writer made from life.
A newly discovered portrait of William Shakespeare is seen in central London, March 9, 2009. The portrait is believed to be almost the only authentic image of the writer made from life.   (AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis)
In this undated image made available by the University of Durham, Friday July 11, 2008, the frontispiece of a priceless edition of Shakespeare's works stolen ten years ago is seen.
In this undated image made available by the University of Durham, Friday July 11, 2008, the frontispiece of a "priceless" edition of Shakespeare's works stolen ten years ago is seen.   (AP Photo/University of Durham, HO, File)
U.S. Supreme Justice John Paul Stevens, right, pokes fun at his colleague, Justice Antonin Scalia, left, during the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals annual dinner in Chicago, Monday, May 19, 2008.
U.S. Supreme Justice John Paul Stevens, right, pokes fun at his colleague, Justice Antonin Scalia, left, during the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals annual dinner in Chicago, Monday, May 19, 2008.   (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

A lot of people like to think it's Shakespeare because they like to think that a commoner can be such a brilliant writer. Even though there is no Santa Claus, it's a wonderful myth. - John Paul Stevens

It is probably more likely that the pro-Shakespearean people are affected by a democratic bias than the Oxfordians are affected by an aristocratic bias. - Antonin Scalia

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
Mr.C
Apr 18, 2009 6:30 AM CDT
Yeah, has Susan Boyle taught us nothing? :-)
opheliaglass
Apr 18, 2009 4:28 AM CDT
Hmm... That is a good point. I do like the fact that they sit around discussing this stuff! I think it is wholly possible that a "hick like William Shakespeare" could write such plays. He might have been a "commoner", but his father was considerably wealthy. (I think he was actually both a glove maker and merchant.) And also, Shakespeare was educated, having read the plays of Seneca and co. I find it offensive that they apparently believe that a bumpkin could not learn to speak eloquently.
Mad
Apr 18, 2009 2:00 AM CDT
"Much ado about nothing"
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne