Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

1st Amendment v. Dogfight Video: High Court to Decide

Conviction rests on First Amendment status of animal abuse tapes

By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 20, 2009 2:56 PM CDT

(Newser) – The Supreme Court agreed today to hear that pits the First Amendment against the production and sale of dogfighting videos, the Chicago Tribune reports. The case involves a man jailed for selling several brutally explicit videos of pit bulls fighting. A federal appeals court overturned his conviction on grounds that the law against dogfighting videos violated free-speech protections—which apply even to depictions of illegal activity.

The appeals court noted that exceptions exist, most notably for child pornography, whose illegality supercedes First Amendment protections. But the court was unwilling to create, in dogfighting videos, a new category of unlawful expression. The government appealed to the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in the fall.

Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton speaks about a 2008 dogfighting bust.
Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton speaks about a 2008 dogfighting bust.   (AP Photo)
In this 2008 file photo, one of Michael Vick's fighting dogs hides in its shelter at Best Friends animal sanctuary, north of Kanab, Utah.
In this 2008 file photo, one of Michael Vick's fighting dogs hides in its shelter at Best Friends animal sanctuary, north of Kanab, Utah.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 6 comments
paul123
Apr 23, 2009 5:40 AM CDT
You make it sound like being concerned about a group of grown men that have an organization that functions to stalk LITTLE boys for obvious sexual gratification is a bad thing. I dont think people, republicans or democrats can protest enough about this sort of scum.
paul123
Apr 21, 2009 12:20 PM CDT
OMG, you are so ADD Jenna. Obviously this piece is about animal abuse, and I havn't lost site of that. All I was suggesting, was that this same level of passion should be seen elsewhere. In the case of NAMBLA, you have a bunch of pedophiles hiding behind the 1rst amendment. Wasn't trying to threadjack, but was trying to make an anology. I applaud the anti animal abuse in this piece, and only wish to see it in similar circumstances. If you aren't sure of any of the words I have used, try dictionary.com you dolt.
Mad
Apr 21, 2009 4:21 AM CDT
Why are republicans the only people on the planet that are so fixated on NAMBLA? I swear, the only time I ever hear of this group is from the mouths of republicans. Seems they doth protest too much
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne