Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

6 Steps to Reform Health Care Now: Kennedy

Senator lists needed steps for system overhaul

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted May 4, 2009 10:45 AM CDT

(Newser) – This is the year to end an “American tragedy” and overhaul health care, Sen. Ted Kennedy writes in Politico. The Census Bureau said last year that 46 million Americans had no health insurance--and the economic crisis has added another 4 million to the ranks of the uninsured. It’s time to take advantage of a consensus among US leaders that reform is needed, the senator writes, offering 6 necessary steps.

  1. Create an “affordable path” to coverage for all Americans. This will require, insurers to end medical underwriting, among other “real changes.”
  2. Expand the availability of good care: we may have the world’s best, but mainly the wealthy are getting it.
  3. Tackle illness prevention.
  4. Boost support for people with disabilities.
  5. Step up the battle against “fraud and abuse” in the system.
  6. Find an “acceptable path to pay for these reforms,” meaning “shared responsibility and sacrifice.”

Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., listens as President Barack Obama speaks at the White House Forum on Health Reform in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 5, 2009.
Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., listens as President Barack Obama speaks at the White House Forum on Health Reform in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 5, 2009.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., listens as President Barack Obama speaks at the White House Forum on Health Reform in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 5, 2009.
Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., listens as President Barack Obama speaks at the White House Forum on Health Reform in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 5, 2009.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

All other nations feel the impact of the economic crisis. But no other advanced nation treats its citizens who lose their livelihoods as poorly as we do.
- Edward M. Kennedy

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 12 comments
freethemall
May 7, 2009 2:20 AM CDT
OK, serfin, I did some of the googling, and I'll do some more. I'll say this: It's a bit more complicated then I thought it might be, but it seems to boil down to this: There's a limited amount of healthcare to be apportioned among a growing number of those in need. This means some go without, or if it's made available to all, then there is rationing and (or) waiting periods. In the USA there is the opportunity for, those who can afford it, for the best healthcare, with unhurried doctors, with little or no waiting time. In Canada, this opportunity is curtailed, since healthcare is apportioned on the basis of need, not on the basis of ability to pay. This results in more rationing and waiting times. I'm I right so far?
freethemall
May 6, 2009 5:55 AM CDT
I'll do the googling you recommend and get back to you.
serfinWI
May 5, 2009 6:44 AM CDT
Call any hospital and ask about medicare reimbursement. Or just google it. Hospitals have to take it or leave it. Better some than nothing. Not trying to impress you. And I agree, why would anyone agree to a price below their cost? It definitely doesn't make a lick of sense, but that is our government. Your question about shared risk I thought I addressed with the cost difference rather than being eaten up by the hospital/provider is passed on to the next consumer, who iwn't medicare. With a one-payer system, you're right, the shared risk is spread over many more people, but just check out Canada's woes, just type in Canada's Health Care problems. There are essays. I'm just saying, no system is perfect, but we need some out of the box (es) thinkers,the boxes being private pay and National Health Care. This is the US, can't we come up with something better? And not to start another line of thinking, but a huge cost of business for US health care providers is defensive medicine, which is a whole 'nother debate. Malpractice Insurance is not cheap, and of course, the cost is passed on to the patients. Anyway, thanks for your time. I hope you can spare some time to google.

More Newser Stories

Senate Dems Shave $400B Off Health Care Bill

Kennedy: An Outline for Health-Care Reform

Back-Room Consensus: Require Health Insurance for All

Daschle: Health Reform About Facts, Not Ideology

Oregonians Enter Lottery for Health Insurance


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne