Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

UK Baby Food Worse Than a Burger

Report finds kids' food high in sugar, saturated fat

By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff

Posted May 4, 2009 4:24 PM CDT

(Newser) – Some of Britain's most popular baby food is no more healthy than a cheeseburger, the Guardian reports. A survey by Britain's Children’s Food Campaign showed that a common weaning food by Heinz contained more sugar than a chocolate biscuit, and a mini cheese biscuit made by the company had more saturated fat per 100g than a quarter pounder with cheese from McDonald's.

Only one in four surveyed Heinz products for kids are low in saturated fat, salt, or sugar. "Many foods marketed for babies and young children are advertised as 'healthy,'” CFC’s co-coordinator said. “In reality, in terms of sugar and saturated fat content, some are worse than junk food. In particular, failing to correctly label products that contain dangerous trans fats is outrageous."

 A double cheeseburger, fries and soda lie on a table at Majors Hamburgers December 28, 2003 in Yakima, Washington.
A double cheeseburger, fries and soda lie on a table at Majors Hamburgers December 28, 2003 in Yakima, Washington.   (Getty Images)
Steve Calhoun prepares to bite into a double cheeseburger at Majors Hamburgers December 28, 2003 in Yakima, Washington.
Steve Calhoun prepares to bite into a double cheeseburger at Majors Hamburgers December 28, 2003 in Yakima, Washington.   (Getty Images)
A double cheeseburger, fries, and soda lie on a table at Majors Hamburgers December 28, 2003 in Yakima, Washington.
A double cheeseburger, fries, and soda lie on a table at Majors Hamburgers December 28, 2003 in Yakima, Washington.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
ifbit
May 5, 2009 8:33 AM CDT
@Forderon: Though Sauerkraut's disrespectful tone is unnecessary, I don't believe the logic is shoddy, if it is only the hamburger and not the baby food which is being defended. Outside of the McProcessed world, a hamburger eaten in moderate amounts is probably quite healthy. A fast-food restaurant's version of a hamburger is not a hamburger, no matter how many billions have been served.
Forderon
May 5, 2009 4:58 AM CDT
What kind of shoddy logic is that? It's the chemicals and compounds and the reactions they create in your body that count, not the raw parts.
Jojo
May 4, 2009 9:49 AM CDT
Mmmm that hamburger in the picture looks yummy

More Newser Stories

9 Not-So-Good 'Good' Foods

9 'Innocent' Habits That Make You Old

Taco Bell Unveils Jaredesque Diet

Health Experts Call for Soda Tax

Sweet! 'Lolly Lover' Kid Wins Dream Job as Candy Taster


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne