Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


9

Island 'Hobbits' Separate Human Species

Separate species may have evolved from homo erectus

Share

(Newser) – Two new reports forward the theory that the tiny people who roamed an Indonesian island 8,000 years ago were a separate species of human, the BBC reports, not just pygmy versions of homo sapiens. The biggest clue is the feet of the “hobbits,” which are distinctly primitive but human. Scientists say the 3-foot-tall creatures must have branched off the human line before the modern foot evolved.

The homo floresiensis species appears to descend from a prehistoric human species, like homo erectus, that arrived at the isle more than a million years ago and then shrank, researchers say. The second study, which analyzed small-brained pygmy hippos isolated from mainland ancestors, concludes that the hobbits may have similarly evolved smaller brains—one-third the size of a human’s—in isolation.

The
The "hobbits" roamed an isolated Indonesian island just 8,000 years ago.   (Flickr)
The
The "hobbit" skull is much smaller than that of modern humans, a phenomena that may have occurred in isolation.   (Flickr)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It could be that H. floresiensis' skull has become dwarfed from living on an island, rather than being an abnormal individual or separately-evolved species. - Eleanor Weston, London
Natural History Museum

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
9 comments
VIEWING:
 
SPH
May 7, 09 1:24 PM CDT
These scientists are being punked....Everyone knows the universe is only 6000 years old...... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
myvoice
May 7, 09 2:24 PM CDT
Anyone who thinks the universe is 6000 years old, are just like the people who thought the world was flat... ignorant!
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
May 7, 09 5:25 PM CDT
big numbers scare small-minded people.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Observer
May 7, 09 1:26 PM CDT
Could this be the earliest evidence of the Republican party origins? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
riffran
May 7, 09 1:58 PM CDT
no actually the early republicans put the pansey liberals there, and left them to their own atrophy....too much kum-by=ya and koolaid......stunts the brain (that was as truthfull as the other comment and just as silly).....a article on anthropology....and it's the same ole left vs right....... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.