Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

EPA Eyes Crackdown on Not-So-Green Biofuels

Turns out, it's greener to burn plants than to make ethanol

By Katherine Thompson,  Newser Staff

Posted May 10, 2009 4:24 PM CDT

(Newser) – Plants consume carbon dioxide, so growing corn to produce ethanol should be at worst a zero-sum game, emissions-wise, right? Wrong, says the EPA. There's another factor involved: Turning food crops into fuel drives up their prices, which raises demand for farmland worldwide. In places like Brazil, that means chopping down the rainforest, which produces massive emissions, NPR reports.

Once it factored worldwide deforestation into its energy equations, the EPA found that the current biofuels standards might cause more harm than good—and is considering stricter regulations for ethanol plants that could curb the industry. "What I think this means for the industry is you need to innovate," says a UC Berkeley scientist.

Because of the rising demand for ethanol, farmers are growing more corn, which needs more nitrogen fertilizer than other crops. This raises worries about groundwater pollution.
Because of the rising demand for ethanol, farmers are growing more corn, which needs more nitrogen fertilizer than other crops. This raises worries about groundwater pollution.   (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato)
Corn-and-soybean farmer John Adams walks past corn storage silos on his 950-acre farm Thursday, April 5, 2007, near Atlanta, Ill.
Corn-and-soybean farmer John Adams walks past corn storage silos on his 950-acre farm Thursday, April 5, 2007, near Atlanta, Ill.   (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green, file)
A handful of corn is shown before it is processed at the Tall Corn Ethanol plant in Coon Rapids, Iowa, in this May 24, 2006 file photo.
A handful of corn is shown before it is processed at the Tall Corn Ethanol plant in Coon Rapids, Iowa, in this May 24, 2006 file photo.   (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall, file)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
wwwonderer
May 11, 2009 8:10 AM CDT
I live in Chicago and have seen Durbin push this for years. Of course the corn-growers of IL would love to see corn-based ethanol 'mandated' if you will. Unfortunately it looks like a crappy crop to use. I guess any biofuel discussion would have to to point out the good crops.
lindamae
May 11, 2009 5:32 AM CDT
Repeat after me: NO global warming. WE exhale CO2. Practice good conservation. Plant trees. Add plants to your homes. There are cheap ways to preserve our environment without the cap and trade fiasco. Obmama won't bet loads of tax dollars but that's okay. He's spent too much already.Take 5 minute showers. Conserve energy and water. We can do it.
FreeThemAll
May 11, 2009 4:00 AM CDT
What about garbage?
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne