Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


6

EPA Backs Off Promise to Regulate CO2

Apparent flip follows White House warning on economic fallout

Share

(Newser) – The Environmental Protection Agency is backing away from emissions regulation after a White House memo warned of its economic consequences. As administrator Lisa Jackson presented today an agency finding that greenhouse gases endanger public health, she told Congress this “does not mean regulation.” Previously, Jackson said such a discovery “will indeed trigger the beginning of regulation of CO2,” the Wall Street Journal reports.

“We do understand that there are costs to the economy of addressing global warming,” Jackson told a Senate committee. But she dismissed parts of the White House document, which questions the report’s conclusions. The memo states that “the amount of acknowledged lack of understanding about the basic facts” in the report makes a difficult case for strong government action.

EPA administrator Lisa Jackson gestures as she speaks to faculty and students at Princeton University last week.
EPA administrator Lisa Jackson gestures as she speaks to faculty and students at Princeton University last week.   (AP Photo)
The EPA had found that carbon dioxide is endangering public health.
The EPA had found that carbon dioxide is endangering public health.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Serious risks and potential impacts to public health and welfare have been clearly identified. - Lisa Jackson, EPA administrator

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
lo9an
May 12, 09 2:01 PM CDT
and the cost on my son's lungs? let's move towards efficiency and sustainability already! It's 2009 folks! Apparently the fear mongers won out. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
OldSchool
May 12, 09 5:30 PM CDT
And the dihydrogen monoxide that is poisoning our rivers and streams!
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
Fondue
May 12, 09 3:26 PM CDT
Who's in charge: the government or investors? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Robert_Dada
May 13, 09 6:44 PM CDT
Why investors, of course.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
justme
May 12, 09 8:08 PM CDT
Apparently, the difference between the campaign trail and the real world of governing has won out. Any one issue is easy to solve if you don't have to balance every other issue and all the financial implications. despite my fears to the contrary, I am very happy with Obama's mostly practical approach to the real issues. He is still a Lefty on the poliitically charged stuff but I can't ask for miracles. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.